Literature DB >> 15648726

Searching for patterns in random sequences.

George Wolford1, Sarah E Newman, Michael B Miller, Gagan S Wig.   

Abstract

In a probability-guessing paradigm, participants predict which of two events will occur on each trial. Participants generally frequency match even though frequency matching is nonoptimal with random sequences. The optimal strategy is to guess the most frequent event, maximizing. We hypothesize that frequency matching results from a search for patterns, even in random sequences. Using both callisotomy patients and patients with frontal brain damage, Wolford, Miller, and Gazzaniaga (2000) found frequency matching in the left hemisphere but maximizing in the right hemisphere. In this paper, we show that a secondary task that competes for left hemisphere resources moves the participants toward maximizing but that a right-hemisphere task preserves frequency matching. We also show that a misunderstanding of randomness contributes to frequency matching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15648726     DOI: 10.1037/h0087446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  22 in total

1.  Taking the easy way out? Increasing implementation effort reduces probability maximizing under cognitive load.

Authors:  Christin Schulze; Ben R Newell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-07

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task.

Authors:  David Hecht; Vincent Walsh; Michal Lavidor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Doomed to repeat the successes of the past: history is best forgotten for repeated choices with nonstationary payoffs.

Authors:  Tim Rakow; Katherine Miler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

4.  Probabilistic cue combination: less is more.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Ty W Boyer; Linda B Smith; Chen Yu
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-12-18

5.  Betting on Illusory Patterns: Probability Matching in Habitual Gamblers.

Authors:  Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Andreas Wilke; Benjamin Scheibehenne; Paige McCanney; H Clark Barrett
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-03

6.  Striving for perfection and falling short: The influence of goals on probability matching.

Authors:  Jie Gao; James E Corter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-07

7.  Reconsidering retrieval effects on adult regularization of inconsistent variation in language.

Authors:  Carla L Hudson Kam
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2019-06-28

8.  Differential influence of levodopa on reward-based learning in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Susanne Graef; Guido Biele; Lea K Krugel; Frank Marzinzik; Michael Wahl; Johann Wotka; Fabian Klostermann; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception.

Authors:  David R Wozny; Ulrik R Beierholm; Ladan Shams
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Good judgments do not require complex cognition.

Authors:  Julian N Marewski; Wolfgang Gaissmaier; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.