Literature DB >> 15648563

Stochastic dominance and medical decision making.

Moshe Leshno1, Haim Levy.   

Abstract

Stochastic Dominance (SD) criteria are decision making tools which allow us to choose among various strategies with only partial information on the decision makers' preferences. The notion of Stochastic Dominance has been extensively employed and developed in the area of economics, finance, agriculture, statistics, marketing and operation research since the late 1960s. For example, it may tell us which of two medical treatments with uncertain outcomes is preferred in the absence of full information on the patients' preferences. This paper presents a short review of the SD paradigm and demonstrates how the SD criteria may be employed in medical decision making, using the case of small abdominal aortic aneurysms as an illustration. Thus, for instance by assuming risk aversion one can employ second-degree stochastic dominance to divide the set of all possible treatments into the efficient set, from which the decision makers should always choose, and the inefficient (inferior) set. By employing Prospect Stochastic Dominance (PSD) a similar division can be conducted corresponding to all S-shaped utility functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15648563     DOI: 10.1023/b:hcms.0000039383.54736.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  10 in total

1.  Detection and management of small aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Robert W Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  On a Theorem of Hardy, Littlewood, Polya, and Blackwell.

Authors:  S Sherman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1951-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Authors:  David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?

Authors:  B J Cohen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Long-term outcomes of immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J T Powell; A R Brady; L C Brown; F G R Fowkes; R M Greenhalgh; C V Ruckley; S G Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Immediate repair compared with surveillance of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Frank A Lederle; Samuel E Wilson; Gary R Johnson; Donovan B Reinke; Fred N Littooy; Charles W Acher; David J Ballard; Louis M Messina; Ian L Gordon; Edmund P Chute; William C Krupski; Steven J Busuttil; Gary W Barone; Steven Sparks; Linda M Graham; Joseph H Rapp; Michel S Makaroun; Gregory L Moneta; Robert A Cambria; Raymond G Makhoul; Darwin Eton; Howard J Ansel; Julie A Freischlag; Dennis Bandyk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Measuring preferences for health states worse than death.

Authors:  D L Patrick; H E Starks; K C Cain; R F Uhlmann; R A Pearlman
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Risk attitudes in gambles involving length of life: aspirations, variations, and ruminations.

Authors:  R F Nease
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Risk attitude in gambles with years of life: empirical support for prospect theory.

Authors:  L C Verhoef; A F de Haan; W A van Daal
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer.

Authors:  B J McNeil; R Weichselbaum; S G Pauker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Output correlations in probabilistic models with multiple alternatives.

Authors:  Klemen Naveršnik
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-01-04

2.  Beyond the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve: The appropriateness of rank probabilities for presenting the results of economic evaluation in multiple technology appraisal.

Authors:  David Epstein
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.046

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.