Literature DB >> 15647914

Cephalomedullary nailing for proximal femoral fractures.

Rahul Kakkar1, S Kumar, A K Singh.   

Abstract

From May 1999 to April 2002, we treated 14 patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures and seven patients with ipsilateral fractures of the femoral neck and shaft using a second-generation cephalomedullary interlocked nail. Patients mean age was 36 (20-60) years, and 19 fractures were caused by high-energy trauma. Four patients had associated injuries. The average follow-up was 23 (16-30) months. Per-operatively, we had problems in locating the entry portal in four patients, and one nail was driven through the inter-condylar notch. All fractures except two united. One patient had non-union of the femoral neck and one of both neck and shaft. One patient united with shortening of more than 1.5 cm and varus angulation at the fracture site. Two patients had loosening and backing out of the proximal screw. The second-generation cephalomedullary nail is a suitable treatment option for proximal femoral fractures, but it requires a high degree of accuracy and technical expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647914      PMCID: PMC3456955          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-004-0624-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

1.  A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  A Herrera; L J Domingo; A Calvo; A Martínez; J Cuenca
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-07-31       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices.

Authors:  L Audigé; B Hanson; M F Swiontkowski
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  S H Bridle; A D Patel; M Bircher; P T Calvert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-03

4.  Technical aspects of the use of the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail.

Authors:  N P Coleman; C G Greenough; P J Warren; D W Clark; R Burnett
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  The treatment of difficult proximal femoral fractures with the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail.

Authors:  C Garnavos; A Peterman; P W Howard
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Initial experience with a second generation locking femoral nail: the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail.

Authors:  G K Hoover; B D Browner; J D Cole; C P Comstock; H B Cotler
Journal:  Contemp Orthop       Date:  1991-09

7.  Ipsilateral fracture of the femoral neck and shaft, treatment by reconstruction interlocking nail.

Authors:  M Hossam ElShafie; H Adel Morsey; Y Emad Eid
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor reconstructive nail.

Authors:  P Randelli; S Landi; F Fanton; G K Hoover; M Morandi
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  F S Bennett; D M Zinar; D J Kilgus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A preliminary experience with the Russell-Taylor reconstruction nail for complex femoral fractures.

Authors:  W J Bose; A Corces; L D Anderson
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Ipsilateral hip and femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nails.

Authors:  M Shantharam Shetty; M Ajith Kumar; Sandeep S Ireshanavar; Dr Sudhakar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Results of proximal femur nail antirotation for low velocity trochanteric fractures in elderly.

Authors:  Ashok Sunil Gavaskar; Muthukumar Subramanian; Naveen Chowdary Tummala
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.251

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.