Literature DB >> 15647465

Comparison of odorant specificity of two human olfactory receptors from different phylogenetic classes and evidence for antagonism.

Guenhaël Sanz1, Claire Schlegel, Jean-Claude Pernollet, Loïc Briand.   

Abstract

Humans are able to detect and discriminate myriads of odorants using only several hundred olfactory receptors (ORs) classified in two major phylogenetic classes representing ORs from aquatic (class I) and terrestrial animals (class II). Olfactory perception results in a combinatorial code, in which one OR recognizes multiple odorants and different odorants are recognized by different combinations of ORs. Moreover, recent data suggest that odorants could also behave as antagonists for other ORs, thus making the combinatorial coding more complex. Here we describe the odorant repertoires of two human ORs belonging to class I and class II, respectively. For this purpose, we set up an assay based on calcium imaging in which 100 odorants were screened using air-phase odorant stimulation at physiological doses. We showed that the human class I OR52D1 is functional, exhibiting a narrow repertoire related to that of its orthologous murine OR, demonstrating than this human class I OR is not an evolutionary relic. The class II OR1G1 was revealed to be broadly tuned towards odorants of 9-10 carbon chain length, with diverse functional groups. The existence of antagonist odorants for the class II OR was also demonstrated. They are structurally related to the agonists, with shorter carbon chain length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647465     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bji002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  49 in total

Review 1.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Extensive copy-number variation of the human olfactory receptor gene family.

Authors:  Janet M Young; Raelynn M Endicott; Sean S Parghi; Megan Walker; Jeffrey M Kidd; Barbara J Trask
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Immunocytochemical Localization of Olfactory-signaling Molecules in Human and Rat Spermatozoa.

Authors:  Yuliya Makeyeva; Christopher Nicol; William L Ledger; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Distinct evolutionary patterns between chemoreceptors of 2 vertebrate olfactory systems and the differential tuning hypothesis.

Authors:  Wendy E Grus; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Modeling of mammalian olfactory receptors and docking of odorants.

Authors:  Guillaume Launay; Guenhaël Sanz; Edith Pajot-Augy; Jean-François Gibrat
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  How broadly tuned olfactory receptors equally recognize their agonists. Human OR1G1 as a test case.

Authors:  Landry Charlier; Jérémie Topin; Catherine Ronin; Soo-Kyung Kim; William A Goddard; Roman Efremov; Jérôme Golebiowski
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  The styryl dye FM1-43 suppresses odorant responses in a subset of olfactory neurons by blocking cyclic nucleotide-gated (CNG) channels.

Authors:  Esther Breunig; Eugen Kludt; Dirk Czesnik; Detlev Schild
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Modulation of the combinatorial code of odorant receptor response patterns in odorant mixtures.

Authors:  Claire A de March; William B Titlow; Tomoko Sengoku; Patrick Breheny; Hiroaki Matsunami; Timothy S McClintock
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.314

9.  High-throughput analysis of mammalian olfactory receptors: measurement of receptor activation via luciferase activity.

Authors:  Casey Trimmer; Lindsey L Snyder; Joel D Mainland
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Olfactory psychometric functions for homologous 2-ketones.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.