Literature DB >> 15647093

Assessing the acceptability and feasibility of the MEND Programme in a small group of obese 7-11-year-old children.

P M Sacher1, P Chadwick, J C K Wells, J E Williams, T J Cole, M S Lawson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: An uncontrolled, pilot study to evaluate feasibility and acceptability of a new community based childhood obesity treatment programme.
METHODS: The mind, exercise, nutrition and diet (MEND) programme was held at a sports centre, twice-weekly, for 3 months. The programme consists of behaviour modification, physical activity and nutrition education. The primary outcome measure was waist circumference. Secondary outcomes were body mass index (BMI), cardiovascular fitness (heart rate, blood pressure and number of steps in 2 min), self-esteem and body composition. BMI of parents was also measured. See http://www.mendprogramme.org.
RESULTS: Eleven obese children (7-11 years) and their families were recruited. Mean attendance was 78% (range 63-88%) with one drop out. Waist circumference, cardiovascular fitness and self-esteem were all significantly improved at 3 months and continued to improve at 6 months. BMI was significantly improved at 3 months but lost significance by 6 months. Deuterium studies showed a beneficial trend but were not significant. Of the 17 parents measured, seven were obese (BMI >/= 30) and eight overweight (BMI >/= 25).
CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small number of participants and no control group, the MEND programme was acceptable to families and produced significant improvements in a range of risk factors associated with obesity that persisted over 3 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15647093     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2004.00578.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  8 in total

1.  Incorporating primary and secondary prevention approaches to address childhood obesity prevention and treatment in a low-income, ethnically diverse population: study design and demographic data from the Texas Childhood Obesity Research Demonstration (TX CORD) study.

Authors:  Deanna M Hoelscher; Nancy F Butte; Sarah Barlow; Elizabeth A Vandewater; Shreela V Sharma; Terry Huang; Eric Finkelstein; Stephen Pont; Paul Sacher; Courtney Byrd-Williams; Abiodun O Oluyomi; Casey Durand; Linlin Li; Steven H Kelder
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 2.992

2.  Translational research: are community-based child obesity treatment programs scalable?

Authors:  Louise L Hardy; Seema Mihrshahi; Joanne Gale; Binh Nguyen; Louise A Baur; Blythe J O'Hara
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Evaluating factors influencing the delivery and outcomes of an incentive-based behaviour change strategy targeting child obesity: protocol for a qualitative process and impact evaluation.

Authors:  Gemma Enright; Alex Gyani; Simon Raadsma; Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Chris Rissel; Christine Innes-Hughes; Sarah Lukeis; Anthony Rodgers; Julie Redfern
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Effect of different physical activity training methods on overweight adolescents.

Authors:  Shohreh Ghatrehsamani; Noushin Khavarian; Maryam Beizaei; Reza Ramedan; Parinaz Poursafa; Roya Kelishadi
Journal:  ARYA Atheroscler       Date:  2010

5.  Process evaluation of an up-scaled community based child obesity treatment program: NSW Go4Fun®.

Authors:  Debra Welsby; Binh Nguyen; Blythe J O'Hara; Christine Innes-Hughes; Adrian Bauman; Louise L Hardy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Effectiveness of a behavioral incentive scheme linked to goal achievement: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julie Redfern; Gemma Enright; Simon Raadsma; Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Christine Innes-Hughes; Santosh Khanal; Santash Khanal; Sarah Lukeis; Chris Rissel; Alex Gyani
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Evaluation of the scale-up and implementation of mind, exercise, nutrition … do it! (MEND) in British Columbia: a hybrid trial type 3 evaluation.

Authors:  Sam Liu; Joy Weismiller; Karen Strange; Lisa Forster-Coull; Jennifer Bradbury; Tom Warshawski; Patti-Jean Naylor
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.125

8.  Identification and evaluation of risk of generalizability biases in pilot versus efficacy/effectiveness trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael W Beets; R Glenn Weaver; John P A Ioannidis; Marco Geraci; Keith Brazendale; Lindsay Decker; Anthony D Okely; David Lubans; Esther van Sluijs; Russell Jago; Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy; James Thrasher; Xiaming Li; Andrew J Milat
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 6.457

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.