Drew A Bednar1, Hamad Al-Harran. 1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont. spinopod@allstream.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using standard components from the small AO external fixator set to support fractures of the distal radius with a construct incorporating distal fixation in the periarticular radius fragment that would allow for primary mobilization of the wrist joint during fracture healing. METHODS: In a prospective pilot study of a nonbridging external fixator in early 2001, 6 consecutive cases of fracture in the distal radius presenting at a tertiary care centre, the Hamilton General Division of Hamilton Health Sciences, were compared with 6 historical controls treated with a standard bridging construct immobilizing the wrist. Both groups were or had been treated with closed reduction and external fixation of the distal radius under fluoroscopic control. Fracture alignment was measured on radiographs after healing and removal of the fixation devices; additional (secondary) outcome measures were pin-tract sepsis and implant loosening (treatment failure). RESULTS: Compared radiographically with controls, alignments after fracture healing were improved (and virtually anatomic) with use of the nonbridging external fixator. The incidence of pin-tract sepsis was similar in the 2 groups, neither of which included any treatment failures. CONCLUSIONS: Nonbridging external fixation of comminuted distal radius fractures can be accomplished safely and effectively. The results of this pilot study suggest that improved radiographic alignment may be achieved with this technique.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of using standard components from the small AO external fixator set to support fractures of the distal radius with a construct incorporating distal fixation in the periarticular radius fragment that would allow for primary mobilization of the wrist joint during fracture healing. METHODS: In a prospective pilot study of a nonbridging external fixator in early 2001, 6 consecutive cases of fracture in the distal radius presenting at a tertiary care centre, the Hamilton General Division of Hamilton Health Sciences, were compared with 6 historical controls treated with a standard bridging construct immobilizing the wrist. Both groups were or had been treated with closed reduction and external fixation of the distal radius under fluoroscopic control. Fracture alignment was measured on radiographs after healing and removal of the fixation devices; additional (secondary) outcome measures were pin-tract sepsis and implant loosening (treatment failure). RESULTS: Compared radiographically with controls, alignments after fracture healing were improved (and virtually anatomic) with use of the nonbridging external fixator. The incidence of pin-tract sepsis was similar in the 2 groups, neither of which included any treatment failures. CONCLUSIONS: Nonbridging external fixation of comminuted distal radius fractures can be accomplished safely and effectively. The results of this pilot study suggest that improved radiographic alignment may be achieved with this technique.