Literature DB >> 15645186

Randomized double-blind, double-dummy crossover clinical trial of oral tramadol versus rectal tramadol administration in opioid-naive cancer patients with pain.

Sebastiano Mercadante1, Edoardo Arcuri, Flavio Fusco, Walter Tirelli, Patrizia Villari, Carlo Bussolino, Tiziana Campa, Franco De Conno, Carla Ripamonti.   

Abstract

Tramadol is commonly used as second step drug of the analgesic ladder. In circumstances where the oral route is unavailable, rectal administration of opioids might be a simple alternative. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic activity and tolerability of tramadol by oral and rectal administration in a double-blind, double-dummy crossover trial. The study included 60 cancer patients with cancer pain no longer responsive to non-opioid drugs. Each patient initially received oral tramadol 50 mg (drops), followed by tramadol sustained release 100 mg orally, and placebo rectally, or tramadol 100 mg rectally and placebo orally, twice a day, in a randomized sequence, on each of 3 days. Patients were allowed to take 50 mg of oral tramadol by drops as needed (four doses per day, to a maximum of 400 mg/day, including the basal dose given by the oral or rectal route). Pain intensity and relief and symptom scores were recorded every day and at the end of each phase of the crossover. The mean age of the patients was 66.1 years (SD 13.5 years); 36 were female, and 44 completed both periods. Patients dropped out due to adverse effects (15 patients) and refusal (1 patient). No differences in the use of rescue dose of oral tramadol were observed between the groups. No differences in pain intensity and relief scores, or in other symptoms between the two treatments were observed. No differences in treatment efficacy as judged by the clinician (P=0.73), in patient compliance (P=0.35), or in patient satisfaction regarding treatment (P<0.35) were found. No differences in adverse effects were found between the two treatments (25.5%, 13 patients, and 20.4%, 11 patients, with oral and rectal treatment, respectively). The proportion of preferences favored oral administration for both physicians (P=0.0002) and patients (P=0.002). Rectal administration of tramadol appears a reliable, noninvasive alternative method of pain control for patients no longer responsive to non-opioid analgesics, unable to take oral tramadol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15645186     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0760-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  20 in total

Review 1.  Review of the rectal use of opioids.

Authors:  L Cole; C D Hanning
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Comparative efficacy and safety of controlled-release morphine suppositories and tablets in cancer pain.

Authors:  N Babul; L Provencher; F Laberge; Z Harsanyi; D Moulin
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.126

3.  A validation study of the WHO method for cancer pain relief.

Authors:  V Ventafridda; M Tamburini; A Caraceni; F De Conno; F Naldi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Drug absorption by sublingual and rectal routes.

Authors:  A G De Boer; L G De Leede; D D Breimer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  The tramadol option.

Authors:  J A Desmeules
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.931

6.  Slow-release tramadol for treatment of chronic malignant pain--an open multicenter trial.

Authors:  F Petzke; L Radbruch; R Sabatowski; M Karthaus; A Mertens
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  High-dose tramadol in comparison to low-dose morphine for cancer pain relief.

Authors:  S Grond; L Radbruch; T Meuser; G Loick; R Sabatowski; K A Lehmann
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 8.  The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation.

Authors:  A R Jadad; G P Browman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Cancer patients' share in a population's use of opioids. A linkage study between a prescription database and the Danish Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Lene Jarlbaek; Morten Andersen; Jakob Kragstrup; Jesper Hallas
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Pharmacokinetics of tramadol and bioavailability of enteral tramadol formulations. 2nd communication: drops with ethanol.

Authors:  W Lintz; H Barth; R Becker; E Frankus; E Schmidt-Böthelt
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1998-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  Tramadol in the treatment of neuropathic cancer pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Daniel Arbaiza; Oscar Vidal
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 2.  Tramadol with or without paracetamol (acetaminophen) for cancer pain.

Authors:  Philip J Wiffen; Sheena Derry; R Andrew Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-16

3.  Comparative study of the analgesic efficacy of rectal tramadol versus intravenous tramadol for adult tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Hina N Gadani; Virendra Pratap Chaudhary
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2010 Jul-Dec

Review 4.  Transmucosal drug administration as an alternative route in palliative and end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Jenny K W Lam; Chucky C K Cheung; Michael Y T Chow; Emily Harrop; Susie Lapwood; Stephen I G Barclay; Ian C K Wong
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 15.470

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.