Literature DB >> 15644753

Effects of controlled dynamic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs: an in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model.

Markus Kroeber1, Frank Unglaub, Thorsten Guehring, Thorsten Guegring, Andreas Nerlich, Tamer Hadi, Jeffrey Lotz, Claus Carstens.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An in vivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model.
OBJECTIVES: Effects of temporary dynamic distraction on intervertebral discs were studied on the lumbar spine rabbit model to characterize the changes associated with disc distraction and to evaluate feasibility of temporary disc distraction to previously compressed discs in order to stimulate disc regeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies have shown that accelerated degeneration of the intervertebral disc results from altered mechanical loading conditions. The development of methods for the prevention of disc degeneration and the restoration of disc tissue that has already degenerated are needed.
METHODS: New Zealand white rabbits (n = 32) were used for this study. The rabbits were randomly assigned to one of five groups. In 12 animals, the discs were first loaded for 28 days using a custom-made external loading device to stimulate disc degeneration. After 28 days loading time, the discs in six animals were distracted for 7 days and in six animals for 28 days using the same external device, however, modified as dynamic distraction device. In six animals, the discs were distracted for 28 days without previous loading; and in six animals, the discs were loaded for 28 days and afterwards the loading device removed for 28 days for recovery without distraction. Six animals were sham operated. The external device was situated; however, the discs remained undistracted and they also served as controls. After 28 to 56 days loading and distraction time, the animals were killed and the lumbar spine was harvested for examination. Disc height, disc morphology, cell viability, relative neutral zone, and tangent modulus were measured.
RESULTS: After 28 days of loading, the discs demonstrated a significant decrease in disc space. Histologically, disorganization of the architecture of the anulus occurred. The number of dead cells increased significantly in the anulus and cartilage endplate. These changes were reversible after 28 days of distraction. The disc thickness increased significantly as compared with the specimens from the 28 days loading group without distraction. Histologically, the discs showed signs of tissue regeneration after 28 days of distraction. The number of dead cells decreased significantly in comparison with the loaded discs without distraction. The flexibility of compressed discs was higher than of compressed/distracted discs.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that disc regeneration can be induced by axial dynamic distraction in the rabbit intervertebral disc. The decompressed rabbit intervertebral discs showed signs of tissue recovery on a biologic, cellular, and a biomechanical level after 28 days of distraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15644753     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000150487.17562.b1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  36 in total

1.  Fusionless procedures for the management of early-onset spine deformities in 2011: what do we know?

Authors:  Behrooz A Akbarnia; Robert M Campbell; Alain Dimeglio; Jack M Flynn; Gregory J Redding; Paul D Sponseller; Michael G Vitale; Muharrem Yazici
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.548

2.  Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device: experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Alejandro Reyes-Sánchez; Barón Zárate-Kalfópulos; Isabel Ramírez-Mora; Luis Miguel Rosales-Olivarez; Armando Alpizar-Aguirre; Guadalupe Sánchez-Bringas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Stress in lumbar intervertebral discs during distraction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin D Zhao; Lawrence J Berglund; Gert Bronfort; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up.

Authors:  Jacques Sénégas; Jean-Marc Vital; Vincent Pointillart; Paolo Mangione
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Comparison of the intervertebral disc spaces between axial and anterior lean cervical traction.

Authors:  Chin-Teng Chung; Sen-Wei Tsai; Chun-Jung Chen; Ting-Chung Wu; David Wang; Haw-Chang H Lan; Shyi-Kuen Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Mechanical concepts for disc regeneration.

Authors:  Klaus John Schnake; Michael Putzier; Norbert P Haas; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Intradiscal pressure measurements in normal discs, compressed discs and compressed discs treated with axial posterior disc distraction: an experimental study on the rabbit lumbar spine model.

Authors:  Thorsten Guehring; Frank Unglaub; Helga Lorenz; Georg Omlor; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Markus W Kroeber
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Anulus fibrosus tension inhibits degenerative structural changes in lamellar collagen.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Lotz; Tamer Hadi; Clayton Bratton; Karen M Reiser; Adam H Hsieh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Cyclic tensile stress exerts a protective effect on intervertebral disc cells.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Sowa; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.159

10.  Cell viability in intervertebral disc under various nutritional and dynamic loading conditions: 3d finite element analysis.

Authors:  Qiaoqiao Zhu; Alicia R Jackson; Wei Yong Gu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.