Literature DB >> 15643212

Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Khaled M Al-Kohlany1, Ahmed A Shokeir, Ahmed Mosbah, Tarek Mohsen, Ahmed M Shoma, Ibrahim Eraky, Mahmoud El-Kenawy, Hamdy A El-Kappany.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the role of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of complete staghorn stones in a prospective randomized manner.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 79 patients with 88 complete staghorn stones, defined as filling the entire collecting system or at least 80% of it, were prospectively randomized for PCNL (43) or open surgery (45). Intraoperative and postoperative morbidity, operative time, hospital stay, and stone clearance at discharge home and followup were compared for both methods. Patients with significant residuals in both groups were subjected to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia) on an outpatient basis. Followup was completed for all cases with a mean duration +/- SD of 4.9 +/- 2.5 months (range 3 to 14). Renal function was evaluated by Tc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine renogram before and after treatment in both groups.
RESULTS: Intraoperative complications in terms of bleeding requiring blood transfusion, and pleural, vascular or ureteral injuries were recorded in 7 patients (16.3%) in the PCNL and 17 (37.8%) in the open surgery groups, a difference of significant value (p <0.05). Major postoperative complications including massive hematuria requiring blood transfusion, septicemia, urinary leakage and wound infection were observed in 8 patients (18.6%) in the PCNL group and in 14 (31.1%) in the open surgery group, a difference of no significant value. PCNL was associated with shorter operative time (127 +/- 30 vs 204 +/- 31 minutes, p <0.001), shorter hospital stay (6.4 +/- 4.2 vs 10 +/- 4.2 days, p <0.001) and earlier return to work (2.5 +/- 0.8 vs 4.1 +/- 1 weeks, p <0.001). On the other hand both treatment groups were comparable in regard to stone-free rates at discharge home (49% vs 66%) and at followup (74% vs 82%). At followup renal function improved or remained stable in 91% and 86.7% in the PCNL and open surgery groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PCNL is a valuable treatment option for complete staghorn stones with a stone-free rate approaching that of open surgery. Moreover, it has the advantages of lower morbidity, shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay and earlier return to work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15643212     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000150519.49495.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  54 in total

Review 1.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Timothy Y Tseng; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-11-10

2.  Impact of stone removal on renal function: a review.

Authors:  Kyle Wood; Tristan Keys; Patrick Mufarrij; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2011

3.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with multiple mini tracts in a single session in treating staghorn calculi.

Authors:  Wen Zhong; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu; Wenzhong Chen; Kaijun Wu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-09-07

Review 4.  Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: Are we really healing our patients?

Authors:  Leonardo de Albuquerque Dos Santos Abreu; Douglas Gregório Camilo-Silva; Gustavo Fiedler; Gustavo Barboza Corguinha; Matheus Miranda Paiva; João Antonio Pereira-Correia; Valter José Fernandes Muller
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of bilateral staghorn renal calculi in pediatric patients: 12 years experience in a tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Manoj Kumar; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Ankur Bansal; Satya Narayan Sankhwar; Ashok Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Chien-Hsing Chang; Chung-Jing Wang; Shi-Wei Huang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-02-18

7.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients with spina bifida, severe spinal deformity and large renal stones.

Authors:  M Alsinnawi; W C Torreggiani; R Flynn; T E D McDermott; R Grainger; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  Construction of a three-dimensional model of renal stones: comprehensive planning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and assistance in surgery.

Authors:  Hulin Li; Yuanbo Chen; Chunxiao Liu; Bingkun Li; Kai Xu; Susu Bao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Struvite urolithiasis and chronic urinary tract infection in a murine model of urinary diversion.

Authors:  Brian Becknell; Ashley R Carpenter; Brad Bolon; John R Asplin; Susan E Ingraham; David S Hains; Andrew L Schwaderer; Kirk M McHugh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  A huge left Staghorn kidney, a case report of inevitable open surgery: a case report.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi; Ali Safari
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.