AIMS: To present our experience in patients with spina bifida with severe spinal abnormality undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for large stone burden. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified five spina bifida patients with abnormal spinal curvature who had a PCNL for large kidney stones. The mean age was 28 years. In two patients, stones were on the concave side of the scoliotic spine further limiting percutaneous access. Mean stone burden was 940 mm2. All patients were paraplegic, three patients had symptomatic stone disease. We performed initial percutaneous renal access in radiology department and staged nephrolithotomy in operating room. Tract dilatation was accomplished using Amplatz dilators and a 24 Ch or 26 Ch nephroscope was used. Fragmentation and stone removal were accomplished in all patients using pneumatic and or ultrasound lithotripter and a retrieval grasper. RESULTS: No anaesthetic complications were recorded. One patient required multiple percutaneous tracts, four had single tract to access stones. Three patients were stone free after PCNL. One required second PCNL through the same tract and another patient had multiple adjunctive ESWL. All five patients were stone clear after the final procedure. Two patients required blood transfusion. No patient had major complication or admission to intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spina bifida is challenging but safe. Detailed pre-operative anaesthetic assessment and precise uroradiological evaluation of renal anatomy is essential. Second-look PCNL and additional ESWL/URS treatment may be required to completely clear stones.
AIMS: To present our experience in patients with spina bifida with severe spinal abnormality undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for large stone burden. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review identified five spina bifidapatients with abnormal spinal curvature who had a PCNL for large kidney stones. The mean age was 28 years. In two patients, stones were on the concave side of the scoliotic spine further limiting percutaneous access. Mean stone burden was 940 mm2. All patients were paraplegic, three patients had symptomatic stone disease. We performed initial percutaneous renal access in radiology department and staged nephrolithotomy in operating room. Tract dilatation was accomplished using Amplatz dilators and a 24 Ch or 26 Ch nephroscope was used. Fragmentation and stone removal were accomplished in all patients using pneumatic and or ultrasound lithotripter and a retrieval grasper. RESULTS: No anaesthetic complications were recorded. One patient required multiple percutaneous tracts, four had single tract to access stones. Three patients were stone free after PCNL. One required second PCNL through the same tract and another patient had multiple adjunctive ESWL. All five patients were stone clear after the final procedure. Two patients required blood transfusion. No patient had major complication or admission to intensive care unit. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spina bifida is challenging but safe. Detailed pre-operative anaesthetic assessment and precise uroradiological evaluation of renal anatomy is essential. Second-look PCNL and additional ESWL/URS treatment may be required to completely clear stones.
Authors: Brian R Matlaga; Ojas D Shah; Ronald J Zagoria; Raymond B Dyer; Stevan B Streem; Dean G Assimos Journal: J Urol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Nathan Lawrentschuk; David Pan; Richard Grills; John Rogerson; David Angus; David R Webb; Damien M Bolton Journal: BJU Int Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.588