Literature DB >> 15643069

Novel interaction between Apc5p and Rsp5p in an intracellular signaling pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Terra G Arnason1, Marnie G Pisclevich, Megan D Dash, Gerald F Davies, Troy A A Harkness.   

Abstract

The ubiquitin-targeting pathway is evolutionarily conserved and critical for many cellular functions. Recently, we discovered a role for two ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s), Rsp5p and the Apc5p subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC), in mitotic chromatin assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the present study, we investigated whether Rsp5p and Apc5p interact in an intracellular pathway regulating chromatin remodeling. Our genetic studies strongly suggest that Rsp5p and Apc5p do interact and that Rsp5p acts upstream of Apc5p. Since E3 enzymes typically require the action of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), we screened E2 mutants for chromatin assembly defects, which resulted in the identification of Cdc34p and Ubc7p. Cdc34p is the E2 component of the SCF (Skp1p/Cdc53p/F-box protein). Therefore, we analyzed additional SCF mutants for chromatin assembly defects. Defective chromatin assembly extracts generated from strains harboring a mutation in the Cdc53p SCF subunit or a nondegradable SCF target, Sic1(Deltaphos), confirmed that the SCF was involved in mitotic chromatin assembly. Furthermore, we demonstrated that Ubc7p physically and genetically interacts with Rsp5p, suggesting that Ubc7p acts as an E2 for Rsp5p. However, rsp5CA and Deltaubc7 mutations had opposite genetic effects on apc5CA and cdc34-2 phenotypes. Therefore, the antagonistic interplay between Deltaubc7 and rsp5CA, with respect to cdc34-2 and apc5CA, indicates that the outcome of Rsp5p's interaction with Cdc34p and Apc5p may depend on the E2 interacting with Rsp5p.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15643069      PMCID: PMC544157          DOI: 10.1128/EC.4.1.134-146.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eukaryot Cell        ISSN: 1535-9786


  60 in total

1.  Multiple subunits of the Caenorhabditis elegans anaphase-promoting complex are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I.

Authors:  Edward S Davis; Lucia Wille; Barry A Chestnut; Penny L Sadler; Diane C Shakes; Andy Golden
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Back to the future with ubiquitin.

Authors:  Cecile M Pickart
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Make it or break it: the role of ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis in cellular regulation.

Authors:  R J Deshaies
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 4.  The ubiquitin system.

Authors:  A Hershko; A Ciechanover
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  L H Hwang; L F Lau; D L Smith; C A Mistrot; K G Hardwick; E S Hwang; A Amon; A W Murray
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast.

Authors:  K Robzyk; J Recht; M A Osley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Hsl1p, a Swe1p inhibitor, is degraded via the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  J L Burton; M J Solomon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  SIC1 is ubiquitinated in vitro by a pathway that requires CDC4, CDC34, and cyclin/CDK activities.

Authors:  R Verma; R M Feldman; R J Deshaies
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.138

9.  SKP1 connects cell cycle regulators to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through a novel motif, the F-box.

Authors:  C Bai; P Sen; K Hofmann; L Ma; M Goebl; J W Harper; S J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-26       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Phenotypic characterization of Drosophila ida mutants: defining the role of APC5 in cell cycle progression.

Authors:  A M Bentley; Byron C Williams; Michael L Goldberg; Andrew J Andres
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Endocytic regulation of alkali metal transport proteins in mammals, yeast and plants.

Authors:  José Miguel Mulet; Vicent Llopis-Torregrosa; Cecilia Primo; Ma Carmen Marqués; Lynne Yenush
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaphase-promoting complex interacts with multiple histone-modifying enzymes to regulate cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Emma L Turner; Mackenzie E Malo; Marnie G Pisclevich; Megan D Dash; Gerald F Davies; Terra G Arnason; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-08-13

3.  Contribution of CAF-I to anaphase-promoting-complex-mediated mitotic chromatin assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Troy A A Harkness; Terra G Arnason; Charmaine Legrand; Marnie G Pisclevich; Gerald F Davies; Emma L Turner
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2005-04

4.  The anaphase promoting complex regulates yeast lifespan and rDNA stability by targeting Fob1 for degradation.

Authors:  Johannes Menzel; Mackenzie E Malo; Cynthia Chan; Martin Prusinkiewicz; Terra G Arnason; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Antagonistic Gcn5-Hda1 interactions revealed by mutations to the Anaphase Promoting Complex in yeast.

Authors:  Azharul Islam; Emma L Turner; Johannes Menzel; Mackenzie E Malo; Troy Aa Harkness
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.130

6.  The yeast forkhead transcription factors fkh1 and fkh2 regulate lifespan and stress response together with the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Spike D L Postnikoff; Mackenzie E Malo; Berchman Wong; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Mechanistic insights into aging, cell-cycle progression, and stress response.

Authors:  S D L Postnikoff; T A A Harkness
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Activating the Anaphase Promoting Complex to Enhance Genomic Stability and Prolong Lifespan.

Authors:  Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Mitotic degradation of yeast Fkh1 by the Anaphase Promoting Complex is required for normal longevity, genomic stability and stress resistance.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Malo; Spike D L Postnikoff; Terra G Arnason; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.682

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.