Literature DB >> 15821127

Contribution of CAF-I to anaphase-promoting-complex-mediated mitotic chromatin assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Troy A A Harkness1, Terra G Arnason, Charmaine Legrand, Marnie G Pisclevich, Gerald F Davies, Emma L Turner.   

Abstract

The anaphase-promoting complex (APC) is required for mitotic progression and genomic stability. Recently, we demonstrated that the APC is also required for mitotic chromatin assembly and longevity. Here, we investigated the role the APC plays in chromatin assembly. We show that apc5(CA) mutations genetically interact with the CAF-I genes as well as ASF1, HIR1, and HIR2. When present in multiple copies, the individual CAF-I genes, CAC1, CAC2, and MSI1, suppress apc5(CA) phenotypes in a CAF-1- and Asf1p-independent manner. CAF-I and the APC functionally overlap, as cac1delta cac2delta msi1delta (caf1delta) cells expressing apc5(CA) exhibit a phenotype more severe than that of apc5(CA) or caf1delta. The Ts- phenotypes observed in apc5(CA) and apc5(CA) caf mutants may be rooted in compromised histone metabolism, as coexpression of histones H3 and H4 suppressed the Ts- defects. Synthetic genetic interactions were also observed in apc5(CA) asf1delta cells. Furthermore, increased expression of genes encoding Asf1p, Hir1p, and Hir2p suppressed the apc5(CA) Ts- defect in a CAF-I-dependent manner. Together, these results suggest the existence of a complex molecular mechanism controlling APC-dependent chromatin assembly. Our data suggest the APC functions with the individual CAF-I subunits, Asf1p, and the Hir1p and Hir2p proteins. However, Asf1p and an intact CAF-I complex are dispensable for CAF-I subunit suppression, whereas CAF-I is necessary for ASF1, HIR1, and HIR2 suppression of apc5(CA) phenotypes. We discuss the implications of our observations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821127      PMCID: PMC1087812          DOI: 10.1128/EC.4.4.673-684.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eukaryot Cell        ISSN: 1535-9786


  72 in total

Review 1.  De novo nucleosome assembly: new pieces in an old puzzle.

Authors:  A Verreault
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Defective S phase chromatin assembly causes DNA damage, activation of the S phase checkpoint, and S phase arrest.

Authors:  Xiaofen Ye; Alexa A Franco; Hidelita Santos; David M Nelson; Paul D Kaufman; Peter D Adams
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Chromatin assembly factor 1 is essential and couples chromatin assembly to DNA replication in vivo.

Authors:  Maarten Hoek; Bruce Stillman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Chromatin assembly factor I mutants defective for PCNA binding require Asf1/Hir proteins for silencing.

Authors:  Denise C Krawitz; Tamar Kama; Paul D Kaufman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  PCNA connects DNA replication to epigenetic inheritance in yeast.

Authors:  Z Zhang; K Shibahara; B Stillman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-09       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Nucleosomal DNA regulates the core-histone-binding subunit of the human Hat1 acetyltransferase.

Authors:  A Verreault; P D Kaufman; R Kobayashi; B Stillman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 7.  Targeting E3 ubiquitin ligases for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Yi Sun
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.742

8.  The histone chaperone Asf1p mediates global chromatin disassembly in vivo.

Authors:  Melissa W Adkins; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin-assembly factors that act during DNA replication function in the maintenance of genome stability.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Vincent Pennaneach; Ellen S Kats; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Histone H3 N-terminal mutations allow hyperactivation of the yeast GAL1 gene in vivo.

Authors:  R K Mann; M Grunstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  9 in total

1.  Checkpoint functions are required for normal S-phase progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae RCAF- and CAF-I-defective mutants.

Authors:  Ellen S Kats; Claudio P Albuquerque; Huilin Zhou; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaphase-promoting complex interacts with multiple histone-modifying enzymes to regulate cell cycle progression.

Authors:  Emma L Turner; Mackenzie E Malo; Marnie G Pisclevich; Megan D Dash; Gerald F Davies; Terra G Arnason; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2010-08-13

3.  Mutual interdependence of MSI1 (CAC3) and YAK1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Zachary L Pratt; Bethany J Drehman; Mary E Miller; Stephen D Johnston
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  The anaphase promoting complex regulates yeast lifespan and rDNA stability by targeting Fob1 for degradation.

Authors:  Johannes Menzel; Mackenzie E Malo; Cynthia Chan; Martin Prusinkiewicz; Terra G Arnason; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Antagonistic Gcn5-Hda1 interactions revealed by mutations to the Anaphase Promoting Complex in yeast.

Authors:  Azharul Islam; Emma L Turner; Johannes Menzel; Mackenzie E Malo; Troy Aa Harkness
Journal:  Cell Div       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.130

6.  The yeast forkhead transcription factors fkh1 and fkh2 regulate lifespan and stress response together with the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Spike D L Postnikoff; Mackenzie E Malo; Berchman Wong; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Mechanistic insights into aging, cell-cycle progression, and stress response.

Authors:  S D L Postnikoff; T A A Harkness
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 8.  Activating the Anaphase Promoting Complex to Enhance Genomic Stability and Prolong Lifespan.

Authors:  Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Mitotic degradation of yeast Fkh1 by the Anaphase Promoting Complex is required for normal longevity, genomic stability and stress resistance.

Authors:  Mackenzie E Malo; Spike D L Postnikoff; Terra G Arnason; Troy A A Harkness
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.682

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.