Literature DB >> 15642692

A robust solution for dealing with environmental changes in intercepting moving balls.

A Chardenon1, G Montagne, M Laurent, R J Bootsma.   

Abstract

The authors tested whether a simple model based on the cancellation of the rate of change in bearing angle could account for the behavioral adaptations produced when individuals intercept moving balls while walking. In Experiment 1, the place of arrival of the ball and the angle of approach were varied. In accord with the model, velocity regulations were earlier and more pronounced the larger the angle of approach. In Experiment 2, ball speed unexpectedly changed during a trial, once again highlighting participants' functional velocity adaptations. A direct test of the model on the basis of each individual trial (N = 256) revealed that, on average, 70% of the total variance could be explained. Together, those results confirm the usefulness of such a robust strategy in the control of interceptive tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15642692     DOI: 10.3200/JMBR.37.1.52-62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  14 in total

1.  Synchronizing self and object movement: how child and adult cyclists intercept moving gaps in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Benjamin J Chihak; Jodie M Plumert; Christine J Ziemer; Sabarish Babu; Timofey Grechkin; James F Cremer; Joseph K Kearney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Postural adjustments and bearing angle use in interceptive actions.

Authors:  Ambreen Chohan; Geert J P Savelsbergh; Paulien van Kampen; Marline Wind; Martine H G Verheul
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Testing the role of expansion in the prospective control of locomotion.

Authors:  Julien Bastin; David M Jacobs; Antoine H P Morice; Cathy Craig; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Humans perceive object motion in world coordinates during obstacle avoidance.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; Melissa S Parade; Jonathan S Matthis
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Environmental constraints modify the way an interceptive action is controlled.

Authors:  Antoine H P Morice; Matthieu François; David M Jacobs; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  How do animals get about by vision? Visually controlled locomotion and orientation after 50 years.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2009-04

8.  Intercepting moving targets: a little foresight helps a lot.

Authors:  Gabriel Jacob Diaz; Flip Phillips; Brett R Fajen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Perceiving and acting on complex affordances: how children and adults bicycle across two lanes of opposing traffic.

Authors:  Timofey Y Grechkin; Benjamin J Chihak; James F Cremer; Joseph K Kearney; Jodie M Plumert
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Behavioral dynamics of intercepting a moving target.

Authors:  Brett R Fajen; William H Warren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.