Literature DB >> 15640387

Short-term high- vs. low-velocity isokinetic lengthening training results in greater hypertrophy of the elbow flexors in young men.

Tim N Shepstone1, Jason E Tang, Stephane Dallaire, Mark D Schuenke, Robert S Staron, Stuart M Phillips.   

Abstract

We performed two studies to determine the effect of a resistive training program comprised of fast vs. slow isokinetic lengthening contractions on muscle fiber hypertrophy. In study I, we investigated the effect of fast (3.66 rad/s; Fast) or slow (0.35 rad/s; Slow) isokinetic high-resistance muscle lengthening contractions on muscle fiber and whole muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) of the elbow flexors was investigated in young men. Twelve subjects (23.8 +/- 2.4 yr; means +/- SD) performed maximal resistive lengthening isokinetic exercise with both arms for 8 wk (3 days/wk), during which they trained one arm at a Fast velocity while the contralateral arm performed an equivalent number of contractions at a Slow velocity. Before (Pre) and after (Post) the training, percutaneous muscle biopsies were taken from the midbelly of the biceps brachii and analyzed for fiber type and CSA. Type I muscle fiber size increased Pre to Post (P < 0.05) in both Fast and Slow arms. Type IIa and IIx muscle fiber CSA increased in both arms, but the increases were greater in the Fast- vs. the Slow-trained arm (P < 0.05). Elbow flexor CSA increased in Fast and Slow arms, with the increase in the Fast arm showing a trend toward being greater (P = 0.06). Maximum torque-generating capacity also increased to a greater degree (P < 0.05) in the Fast arm, regardless of testing velocity. In study II, we attempted to provide some explanation of the greater hypertrophy observed in study I by examining an indicator of protein remodeling (Z-line streaming), which we hypothesized would be greater in the Fast condition. Nine men (21.7 +/- 2.4 yr) performed an acute bout (n = 30, 3 sets x 10 repetitions/set) of maximal lengthening contractions at Fast and Slow velocities used in the training study. Biopsies revealed that Fast lengthening contractions resulted in more (185 +/- 1 7%; P < 0.01) Z-band streaming per millimeter squared muscle vs. the Slow arm. In conclusion, training using Fast (3.66 rad/s) lengthening contractions leads to greater hypertrophy and strength gains than Slow (0.35 rad/s) lengthening contractions. The greater hypertrophy seen in the Fast-trained arm (study I) may be related to a greater amount of protein remodeling (Z-band streaming; study II).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15640387     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01027.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  44 in total

1.  Resistance exercise load does not determine training-mediated hypertrophic gains in young men.

Authors:  Cameron J Mitchell; Tyler A Churchward-Venne; Daniel W D West; Nicholas A Burd; Leigh Breen; Steven K Baker; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-04-19

Review 2.  New fundamental resistance exercise determinants of molecular and cellular muscle adaptations.

Authors:  Marco Toigo; Urs Boutellier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Hypertrophy with unilateral resistance exercise occurs without increases in endogenous anabolic hormone concentration.

Authors:  Sarah B Wilkinson; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Emily J Grant; Caroline E Correia; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Comparison between old and young men for responses to fast velocity maximal lengthening contractions of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Dale W Chapman; M Newton; M R McGuigan; K Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Resistance training using eccentric overload induces early adaptations in skeletal muscle size.

Authors:  Lena Norrbrand; James D Fluckey; Marco Pozzo; Per A Tesch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Similar increases in muscle size and strength in young men after training with maximal shortening or lengthening contractions when matched for total work.

Authors:  Daniel R Moore; Mark Young; Stuart M Phillips
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  The Effects of Eccentric Cadence on Power and Velocity of the Bar during the Concentric Phase of the Bench Press Movement.

Authors:  Michal Wilk; Artur Golas; Michał Krzysztofik; Monika Nawrocka; Adam Zajac
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Eccentric exercise training: modalities, applications and perspectives.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Isner-Horobeti; Stéphane Pascal Dufour; Philippe Vautravers; Bernard Geny; Emmanuel Coudeyre; Ruddy Richard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  What is the best moment to apply phototherapy when associated to a strength training program? A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial : Phototherapy in association to strength training.

Authors:  Adriane Aver Vanin; Eduardo Foschini Miranda; Caroline Santos Monteiro Machado; Paulo Roberto Vicente de Paiva; Gianna Móes Albuquerque-Pontes; Heliodora Leão Casalechi; Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho; Ernesto Cesar Pinto Leal-Junior
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.161

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.