Literature DB >> 15640358

Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants.

Monica Di Giacomo1, Marco Barchi, Frédéric Baudat, Winfried Edelmann, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin.   

Abstract

Defects in meiotic recombination in many organisms result in arrest because of activation of a meiotic checkpoint(s). The proximal defect that triggers this checkpoint in mammalian germ cells is not understood, but it has been suggested to involve either the presence of DNA damage in the form of unrepaired recombination intermediates or defects in homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis independent of DNA damage per se. To distinguish between these possibilities in the female germ line, we compared mouse oocyte development in a mutant that fails to form the double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination (Spo11-/-) to mutants with defects in processing DSBs when they are formed (Dmc1-/- and Msh5-/-), and we examined the epistasis relationships between these mutations. Absence of DSB formation caused a partial defect in follicle formation, whereas defects in DSB repair caused earlier and more severe meiotic arrest, which could be suppressed by eliminating DSB formation. Therefore, our analysis reveals that there are both DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses to recombination errors in mammalian oocytes. By using these findings as a paradigm, we also examined oocyte loss in mutants lacking the DNA-damage checkpoint kinase ATM. The absence of ATM caused defects in folliculogenesis that were similar to those in Dmc1 mutants and that could be suppressed by Spo11 mutation, implying that oocyte death in Atm-deficient animals is a response to defective DSB repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15640358      PMCID: PMC545532          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0406212102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  57 in total

1.  A conserved checkpoint pathway mediates DNA damage--induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in C. elegans.

Authors:  A Gartner; S Milstein; S Ahmed; J Hodgkin; M O Hengartner
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation.

Authors:  S Keeney
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Regulation of meiotic recombination and prophase I progression in mammals.

Authors:  P E Cohen; J W Pollard
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 4.  The pachytene checkpoint.

Authors:  G S Roeder; J M Bailis
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Caenorhabditis elegans msh-5 is required for both normal and radiation-induced meiotic crossing over but not for completion of meiosis.

Authors:  K O Kelly; A F Dernburg; G M Stanfield; A M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Activation of a meiotic checkpoint regulates translation of Gurken during Drosophila oogenesis.

Authors:  A Ghabrial; T Schüpbach
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Recombinational DNA double-strand breaks in mice precede synapsis.

Authors:  S K Mahadevaiah; J M Turner; F Baudat; E P Rogakou; P de Boer; J Blanco-Rodríguez; M Jasin; S Keeney; W M Bonner; P S Burgoyne
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis.

Authors:  P J Romanienko; R D Camerini-Otero
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.970

9.  Meiotic telomere distribution and Sertoli cell nuclear architecture are altered in Atm- and Atm-p53-deficient mice.

Authors:  H Scherthan; M Jerratsch; S Dhar; Y A Wang; S P Goff; T K Pandita
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Meiotic prophase arrest with failure of chromosome synapsis in mice deficient for Dmc1, a germline-specific RecA homolog.

Authors:  D L Pittman; J Cobb; K J Schimenti; L A Wilson; D M Cooper; E Brignull; M A Handel; J C Schimenti
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.970

View more
  113 in total

Review 1.  Prophase I arrest and progression to metaphase I in mouse oocytes: comparison of resumption of meiosis and recovery from G2-arrest in somatic cells.

Authors:  Petr Solc; Richard M Schultz; Jan Motlik
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.025

2.  Evolutionary conservation of meiotic DSB proteins: more than just Spo11.

Authors:  Francesca Cole; Scott Keeney; Maria Jasin
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 3.  The multiple roles of the Mre11 complex for meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Valérie Borde
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.239

4.  Genetic evidence that synaptonemal complex axial elements govern recombination pathway choice in mice.

Authors:  Xin Chenglin Li; Ewelina Bolcun-Filas; John C Schimenti
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  The consequences of asynapsis for mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Paul S Burgoyne; Shantha K Mahadevaiah; James M A Turner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Spata22, a novel vertebrate-specific gene, is required for meiotic progress in mouse germ cells.

Authors:  Sophie La Salle; Kristina Palmer; Marilyn O'Brien; John C Schimenti; John Eppig; Mary Ann Handel
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Caspase 9 is constitutively activated in mouse oocytes and plays a key role in oocyte elimination during meiotic prophase progression.

Authors:  Adriana C Ene; Stephanie Park; Winfried Edelmann; Teruko Taketo
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Mouse TRIP13/PCH2 is required for recombination and normal higher-order chromosome structure during meiosis.

Authors:  Ignasi Roig; James A Dowdle; Attila Toth; Dirk G de Rooij; Maria Jasin; Scott Keeney
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Hormad1 mutation disrupts synaptonemal complex formation, recombination, and chromosome segregation in mammalian meiosis.

Authors:  Yong-Hyun Shin; Youngsok Choi; Serpil Uckac Erdin; Svetlana A Yatsenko; Malgorzata Kloc; Fang Yang; P Jeremy Wang; Marvin L Meistrich; Aleksandar Rajkovic
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Enhancing survival of mouse oocytes following chemotherapy or aging by targeting Bax and Rad51.

Authors:  Loro L Kujjo; Tiina Laine; Ricardo J G Pereira; Wataru Kagawa; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Shigeyuki Yokoyama; Gloria I Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.