Literature DB >> 15640195

Redox interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum in mixed culture under enological conditions.

Naoufel Cheraiti1, Stéphane Guezenec, Jean-Michel Salmon.   

Abstract

Wine yeast starters that contain a mixture of different industrial yeasts with various properties may soon be introduced to the market. The mechanisms underlying the interactions between the different strains in the starter during alcoholic fermentation have never been investigated. We identified and investigated some of these interactions in a mixed culture containing two yeast strains grown under enological conditions. The inoculum contained the same amount (each) of a strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a natural hybrid strain of S. cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum. We identified interactions that affected biomass, by-product formation, and fermentation kinetics, and compared the redox ratios of monocultures of each strain with that of the mixed culture. The redox status of the mixed culture differed from that of the two monocultures, showing that the interactions between the yeast strains involved the diffusion of metabolite(s) within the mixed culture. Since acetaldehyde is a potential effector of fermentation, we investigated the kinetics of acetaldehyde production by the different cultures. The S. cerevisiae-S. uvarum hybrid strain produced large amounts of acetaldehyde for which the S. cerevisiae strain acted as a receiving strain in the mixed culture. Since yeast response to acetaldehyde involves the same mechanisms that participate in the response to other forms of stress, the acetaldehyde exchange between the two strains could play an important role in inhibiting some yeast strains and allowing the growth of others. Such interactions could be of particular importance in understanding the ecology of the colonization of complex fermentation media by S. cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15640195      PMCID: PMC544210          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.255-260.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  24 in total

1.  Effects of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture on in vitro mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation.

Authors:  H M Sullivan; S A Martin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  A two-reservoir, hollow-fiber bioreactor for the study of mixed-population dynamics: design aspects and validation of the approach.

Authors:  E S Manjarrez; C Albasi; J P Riba
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2000-08-20       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to in vitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions.

Authors:  S S Lee; J K Ha; K Cheng
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Intracellular flux of glucose metabolism in streptococcal cells by simultaneous monitoring of fluorescence dependent on reduced nicotinamide adenine nucleotide and acid excretion under strictly anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  Y Iwami; T Yamada
Journal:  Oral Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1999-08

Review 5.  Synergistic interactions in the microbial world.

Authors:  Bernhard Schink
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

6.  Non-respiratory oxygen consumption pathways in anaerobically-grown Saccharomyces cerevisiae: evidence and partial characterization.

Authors:  Eric Rosenfeld; Bertrand Beauvoit; Michel Rigoulet; Jean-Michel Salmon
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Enhanced kefiran production by mixed culture of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Benjamas Cheirsilp; Hiroshi Shimizu; Suteaki Shioya
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2003-01-09       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Correlation between acetaldehyde and ethanol resistance and expression of HSP genes in yeast strains isolated during the biological aging of sherry wines.

Authors:  Agustín Aranda; Amparo Querol; Marcel li del Olmo
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Nisin production by a mixed-culture system consisting of Lactococcus lactis and Kluyveromyces marxianus.

Authors:  H Shimizu; T Mizuguchi; E Tanaka; S Shioya
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the cytosolic Mg(2+) and mitochondrial K(+) acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation.

Authors:  F Remize; E Andrieu; S Dequin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  9 in total

1.  Regional microbial signatures positively correlate with differential wine phenotypes: evidence for a microbial aspect to terroir.

Authors:  Sarah Knight; Steffen Klaere; Bruno Fedrizzi; Matthew R Goddard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism in ecological context.

Authors:  Paula Jouhten; Olga Ponomarova; Ramon Gonzalez; Kiran R Patil
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.796

3.  Effect of Temperature on the Prevalence of Saccharomyces Non cerevisiae Species against a S. cerevisiae Wine Strain in Wine Fermentation: Competition, Physiological Fitness, and Influence in Final Wine Composition.

Authors:  Javier Alonso-Del-Real; María Lairón-Peris; Eladio Barrio; Amparo Querol
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Biotechnological Approach Based on Selected Saccharomyces cerevisiae Starters for Reducing the Use of Sulfur Dioxide in Wine.

Authors:  Angela Capece; Rocchina Pietrafesa; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-15

Review 5.  Microbial interactions in alcoholic beverages.

Authors:  Rafael Torres-Guardado; Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso; Cristina Reguant; Albert Bordons
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Quantitative 1H-NMR-metabolomics reveals extensive metabolic reprogramming and the effect of the aquaglyceroporin FPS1 in ethanol-stressed yeast cells.

Authors:  Artur B Lourenço; Filipa C Roque; Miguel C Teixeira; José R Ascenso; Isabel Sá-Correia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Yeast ratio is a critical factor for sequential fermentation of papaya wine by Williopsis saturnus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Pin-Rou Lee; Stephanie Hui Chern Kho; Bin Yu; Philip Curran; Shao-Quan Liu
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 5.813

Review 8.  Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Angela Capece; Francesca Comitini; Laura Canonico; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Non-conventional Yeast Species for Lowering Ethanol Content of Wines.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Pilar Morales; Francesca Comitini; Jordi Tronchoni; Laura Canonico; José A Curiel; Lucia Oro; Alda J Rodrigues; Ramon Gonzalez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.