Literature DB >> 10966394

Relative contributions of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi to in vitro degradation of orchard grass cell walls and their interactions.

S S Lee1, J K Ha, K Cheng.   

Abstract

To assess the relative contributions of microbial groups (bacteria, protozoa, and fungi) in rumen fluids to the overall process of plant cell wall digestion in the rumen, representatives of these groups were selected by physical and chemical treatments of whole rumen fluid and used to construct an artificial rumen ecosystem. Physical treatments involved homogenization, centrifugation, filtration, and heat sterilization. Chemical treatments involved the addition of antibiotics and various chemicals to rumen fluid. To evaluate the potential activity and relative contribution to degradation of cell walls by specific microbial groups, the following fractions were prepared: a positive system (whole ruminal fluid), a bacterial (B) system, a protozoal (P) system, a fungal (F) system, and a negative system (cell-free rumen fluid). To assess the interactions between specific microbial fractions, mixed cultures (B+P, B+F, and P+F systems) were also assigned. Patterns of degradation due to the various treatments resulted in three distinct groups of data based on the degradation rate of cell wall material and on cell wall-degrading enzyme activities. The order of degradation was as follows: positive and F systems > B system > negative and P systems. Therefore, fungal activity was responsible for most of the cell wall degradation. Cell wall degradation by the anaerobic bacterial fraction was significantly less than by the fungal fraction, and the protozoal fraction failed to grow under the conditions used. In general, in the mixed culture systems the coculture systems demonstrated a decrease in cellulolysis compared with that of the monoculture systems. When one microbial fraction was associated with another microbial fraction, two types of results were obtained. The protozoal fraction inhibited cellulolysis of cell wall material by both the bacterial and the fungal fractions, while in the coculture between the bacterial fraction and the fungal fraction a synergistic interaction was detected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966394      PMCID: PMC92224          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.9.3807-3813.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  13 in total

1.  Enumeration of anaerobic chytridiomycetes as thallus-forming units: novel method for quantification of fibrolytic fungal populations from the digestive tract ecosystem.

Authors:  M K Theodorou; M Gill; C King-Spooner; D E Beever
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effect of ciliate protozoa on the activity of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes and fibre breakdown in the rumen ecosystem.

Authors:  A G Williams; S E Withers
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1991-02

3.  Effect of Methanobrevibacter smithii on Xylanolytic Activity of Anaerobic Ruminal Fungi.

Authors:  K N Joblin; G E Naylor; A G Williams
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Cellulose fermentation by a rumen anaerobic fungus in both the absence and the presence of rumen methanogens.

Authors:  T Bauchop; D O Mountfort
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Fermentation of Cellulose to Methane and Carbon Dioxide by a Rumen Anaerobic Fungus in a Triculture with Methanobrevibacter sp. Strain RA1 and Methanosarcina barkeri.

Authors:  D O Mountfort; R A Asher; T Bauchop
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Influence of rumen protozoa and bacteria upon cellulose digestion in vitro.

Authors:  R D Yoder; A Trenkle; W Burroughs
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Inhibition of the cellulolytic activity of Neocallimastix frontalis by Ruminococcus flavefaciens.

Authors:  A Bernalier; G Fonty; F Bonnemoy; P Gouet
Journal:  J Gen Microbiol       Date:  1993-04

Review 8.  Nutritional features and ecology of predominant anaerobic bacteria of the intestinal tract.

Authors:  M P Bryant
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Influence of hydrogen-consuming bacteria on cellulose degradation by anaerobic fungi.

Authors:  F D Marvin-Sikkema; A J Richardson; C S Stewart; J C Gottschal; R A Prins
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Adsorption of soluble proteins to rumen bacteria and the role of adsorption in proteolysis.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.718

View more
  34 in total

1.  An intron-containing glycoside hydrolase family 9 cellulase gene encodes the dominant 90 kDa component of the cellulosome of the anaerobic fungus Piromyces sp. strain E2.

Authors:  Peter J M Steenbakkers; Wimal Ubhayasekera; Harry J A M Goossen; Erik M H M van Lierop; Chris van der Drift; Godfried D Vogels; Sherry L Mowbray; Huub J M Op den Camp
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 2.  A new look at xylanases: an overview of purification strategies.

Authors:  Paula Sá-Pereira; Helena Paveia; Maria Costa-Ferreira; Maria Aires-Barros
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists.

Authors:  P Frey-Klett; P Burlinson; A Deveau; M Barret; M Tarkka; A Sarniguet
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Differentiation of anaerobic polycentric fungi by rDNA PCR-RFLP.

Authors:  K Fliegerová; J Mrázek; K Voigt
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Microbial diversity in the rumen, reticulum, omasum, and abomasum of yak on a rapid fattening regime in an agro-pastoral transition zone.

Authors:  Dan Xue; Huai Chen; Xiaolin Luo; Jiuqiang Guan; Yixin He; Xinquan Zhao
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.422

6.  Regulatory Properties of the ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase from the Clostridial Firmicutes Member Ruminococcus albus.

Authors:  Antonela E Cereijo; Matías D Asencion Diez; Miguel A Ballicora; Alberto A Iglesias
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Metagenomics survey unravels diversity of biogas microbiomes with potential to enhance productivity in Kenya.

Authors:  Samuel Mwangangi Muturi; Lucy Wangui Muthui; Paul Mwangi Njogu; Justus Mong'are Onguso; Francis Nyamu Wachira; Stephen Obol Opiyo; Roger Pelle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Redox interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum in mixed culture under enological conditions.

Authors:  Naoufel Cheraiti; Stéphane Guezenec; Jean-Michel Salmon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Comparative quantitative analysis of gene expression profiles of glycoside hydrolase family 10 xylanases in the sheep rumen during a feeding cycle.

Authors:  Zhongyuan Li; Heng Zhao; Peilong Yang; Junqi Zhao; Huoqing Huang; Xianli Xue; Xinshang Zhang; Qiyu Diao; Bin Yao
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Disentangling the Complexity of the Rumen Microbial Diversity Through Fractionation Using a Sucrose Density Gradient.

Authors:  Ruth Hernández; Hugo Jimenez; Cesar Vargas-Garcia; Alejandro Caro-Quintero; Alejandro Reyes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.