Literature DB >> 15639172

A comparison of wild-caught wood mice and bank voles in the Intellicage: assessing exploration, daily activity patterns and place learning paradigms.

Michael J Galsworthy1, Irmgard Amrein, Pavel A Kuptsov, Inga I Poletaeva, Pascal Zinn, Anton Rau, Alexei Vyssotski, Hans-Peter Lipp.   

Abstract

Our previous work has revealed very high baseline neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of wood mice as compared particularly to bank voles; a difference which may be related to learning capacity. This study explored whether the newly-developed Intellicage system could be used to compare these species in simple spatial learning paradigms. The Intellicage is essentially a group-housing cage that also allows continuous automatic recording of each individual's behaviour. Seven wild-caught bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) were compared with seven wild-caught long-tailed wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) in the Intellicage system over 9 days. During the first 90 min after entering the cage, the wood mice were substantially more exploratory than the bank voles (P = 0.003). Over subsequent days, both species showed nocturnal activity increases with voles being 3.7 times more active overall. In the spatial learning paradigms, there were significant species-by-time interactions with wood mice outperforming bank voles on both place learning (P = 0.027) and subsequent reversal (P = 0.006). Conclusions are firstly that the wood mice show superior learning abilities in this paradigm, and secondly that the Intellicage serves as a valuable cognitive testing arena for small wild rodents, or for circumstances where cognition must be compared independent of different responses to handling or novel environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15639172     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  47 in total

1.  Differential involvement of the central amygdala in appetitive versus aversive learning.

Authors:  Ewelina Knapska; Grazyna Walasek; Evgeni Nikolaev; Frieder Neuhäusser-Wespy; Hans-Peter Lipp; Leszek Kaczmarek; Tomasz Werka
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Reliability, robustness, and reproducibility in mouse behavioral phenotyping: a cross-laboratory study.

Authors:  Silvia Mandillo; Valter Tucci; Sabine M Hölter; Hamid Meziane; Mumna Al Banchaabouchi; Magdalena Kallnik; Heena V Lad; Patrick M Nolan; Abdel-Mouttalib Ouagazzal; Emma L Coghill; Karin Gale; Elisabetta Golini; Sylvie Jacquot; Wojtek Krezel; Andy Parker; Fabrice Riet; Ilka Schneider; Daniela Marazziti; Johan Auwerx; Steve D M Brown; Pierre Chambon; Nadia Rosenthal; Glauco Tocchini-Valentini; Wolfgang Wurst
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 3.107

3.  General learning ability regulates exploration through its influence on rate of habituation.

Authors:  Kenneth R Light; Henya Grossman; Stefan Kolata; Christopher Wass; Louis D Matzel
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Assessment of locomotion in chlorine exposed mice by computer vision and neural networks.

Authors:  Aristotelis S Filippidis; Sotirios G Zarogiannis; Alan Randich; Timothy J Ness; Sadis Matalon
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2011-12-29

5.  Systematic heterogenization for better reproducibility in animal experimentation.

Authors:  S Helene Richter
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 12.625

6.  Lack of anticipatory behavior in Gpr88 knockout mice showed by automatized home cage phenotyping.

Authors:  G Maroteaux; T M Arefin; L-A Harsan; E Darcq; S Ben Hamida; B L Kieffer
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Munc18-1 haploinsufficiency impairs learning and memory by reduced synaptic vesicular release in a model of Ohtahara syndrome.

Authors:  Albert Orock; Sreemathi Logan; Ferenc Deak
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 4.314

8.  Spatial learning impairments in PLB1Triple knock-in Alzheimer mice are task-specific and age-dependent.

Authors:  D Ryan; D Koss; E Porcu; H Woodcock; L Robinson; B Platt; G Riedel
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 9.261

9.  Decreased cytogenesis in the granule cell layer of the hippocampus and impaired place learning after irradiation of the young mouse brain evaluated using the IntelliCage platform.

Authors:  Anna Barlind; Niklas Karlsson; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Jörgen Isgaard; Klas Blomgren
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A robust automated system elucidates mouse home cage behavioral structure.

Authors:  Evan H Goulding; A Katrin Schenk; Punita Juneja; Adrienne W MacKay; Jennifer M Wade; Laurence H Tecott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.