Literature DB >> 15638894

Prostate cancer: socio-economic, geographical and private-health insurance effects on care and survival.

Sonĵa E Hall1, C D'Arcy J Holman, Z Stan Wisniewski, James Semmens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of demographic, geographical and socio-economic factors, and the influence of private health insurance, on patterns of prostate cancer care and 3-year survival in Western Australia (WA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The WA Record Linkage Project was used to extract all hospital morbidity, cancer and death records of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1982 and 2001. The likelihood of having a radical prostatectomy (RP) was estimated using logistic regression, and the likelihood of death 3 years after diagnosis was estimated using Cox regression.
RESULTS: The proportion of men undergoing RP increased six-fold, from 3.1% to 20.1%, over the 20 years, whilst non-radical surgery (transurethral, open or closed prostatectomy) simultaneously halved to 29%. Men who had RP were typically younger, married and with less comorbidity. Patients with a first admission to a rural hospital were much less likely to have RP (odds ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.11-0.21), whereas residence alone in a rural area had less effect (0.54, 0.29-1.03). A first admission to a private hospital increased the likelihood of having RP (2.40, 2.11-2.72), as did having private health insurance (1.77, 1.56-2.00); being more socio-economically disadvantaged reduced RP (0.63, 0.47-0.83). The 3-year mortality rate was greater with a first admission to a rural hospital (relative risk 1.22; 95% CI 1.09-1.36) and in more socio-economically disadvantaged groups (1.34, 1.10-1.64), whereas those admitted to a private hospital (0.77, 0.71-0.84) or with private health insurance (0.82, 0.76-0.89) fared better. Men who had RP had better survival than those who had non-radical surgery (4.85, 3.52-6.68) or no surgery (6.42, 4.65-8.84), although this may be an artefact of a screening effect.
CONCLUSION: The 3-year survival was poorer and the use of RP less frequent in men from socio-economically and geographically disadvantaged backgrounds, particularly those admitted to rural or public hospitals, and those with no private health insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15638894     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05248.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  22 in total

1.  Clarifying the positive association between education and prostate cancer: a Monte Carlo simulation approach.

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska; Andriy Anishkin
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-03-21

2.  Population based time trends and socioeconomic variation in use of radiotherapy and radical surgery for prostate cancer in a UK region: continuous survey.

Authors:  Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Josephine M Barbiere; David C Greenberg; Karen A Wright; David E Neal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-04-21

3.  Race and the likelihood of localized prostate cancer at diagnosis among men in 4 southeastern states.

Authors:  Mohammed Norman Oliver; George J Stukenborg
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  Factors associated with time-to-treatment of prostate cancer in Florida.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Fei Tan; Pierre Goovaerts; Georges Adunlin; Askal Ali; Youjie Huang; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-11

5.  Socio-economic inequalities in survival of patients with prostate cancer: role of age and Gleason grade at diagnosis.

Authors:  Kashif Shafique; David S Morrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prostate cancer severity associations with neighborhood deprivation.

Authors:  Charnita M Zeigler-Johnson; Ann Tierney; Timothy R Rebbeck; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-10-09

7.  Using linked routinely collected health data to describe prostate cancer treatment in New South Wales, Australia: a validation study.

Authors:  David E Goldsbury; David P Smith; Bruce K Armstrong; Dianne L O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Trends in non-metastatic prostate cancer management in the Northern and Yorkshire region of England, 2000-2006.

Authors:  L Fairley; M Baker; J Whiteway; W Cross; D Forman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Do evolutionary life-history trade-offs influence prostate cancer risk? a review of population variation in testosterone levels and prostate cancer disparities.

Authors:  Louis Calistro Alvarado
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Socioeconomic status, race, and long-term outcomes after radical prostatectomy in an equal access health system: Results from the SEARCH database.

Authors:  Mary M Everist; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Martha K Terris; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.