Literature DB >> 15637725

Changing demographics of advanced maternal age (AMA) and the impact on the predicted incidence of Down syndrome in the United States: Implications for prenatal screening and genetic counseling.

Robert G Resta1.   

Abstract

This study documents the changes in the percentages of advanced maternal age (AMA) pregnancies in the United States and in Washington State, underlying demographic factors, the impact on the predicted incidence of Down syndrome, and its impact on Down syndrome screening. Data on births in the United States from 1933 to 2002 were obtained from publications and the website of the National Center for Health Statistics. Data for Washington State were obtained from the website of the Washington State Department of Health. Information on births at Swedish Medical Center was obtained from hospital records. The percentage of AMA pregnancies in the US was about 14% before World War II, dropped steadily to about 5% in the 1970s and rose since the 1980s to about 14% in 2002. AMA Fractions are greatest among non-Hispanic Caucasians and Asian/Pacific Islanders, women who have college education and beyond, and are married. However, since 1980, the AMA Fractions have increased across all racial/ethnic groups, educational levels, and married and unmarried women. In Washington State in 2001, the overall AMA Fraction was about 14%, but there was considerable variation in the AMA Fraction across counties. In 1980, AMA pregnancies accounted for about 25% of pregnancies with Down syndrome in the United States. In 2002, AMA pregnancies accounted for more than 50% of Down syndrome pregnancies. Given the current AMA Fraction, offering amniocentesis to women of age 35 and above would result in one in seven pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis. Based on likelihood ratios, AMA as a screening strategy for Down syndrome is significantly inferior to combined serum and sonographic screening. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15637725     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  13 in total

1.  Effectiveness of pre-counseling genetic education workshops at a large urban community health center serving low-income Chinese American women.

Authors:  Shao-Chee Sim; Xiaojie Diana Zhou; Laureen D Hom; Christine Chen; Rebecca Sze
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Maternal age-based prenatal screening for chromosomal disorders: attitudes of women and health care providers toward changes.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Andrea Rideout; Brenda J Wilson; Judith Allanson; Sean Blaine; Mary Jane Esplen; Sandra Farrell; Gail E Graham; Jennifer MacKenzie; Wendy S Meschino; Preeti Prakash; Cheryl Shuman; Sherry Taylor; Stasey Tobin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Revisiting Down syndrome from the ENT perspective: review of literature and recommendations.

Authors:  Maria Ramia; Umayya Musharrafieh; Wajdi Khaddage; Alain Sabri
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Imaging findings in Down syndrome.

Authors:  Rupa Radhakrishnan; Alexander J Towbin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-04-16

5.  Epidemiology of obstetric-related ICU admissions in Maryland: 1999-2008*.

Authors:  Jonathan P Wanderer; Lisa R Leffert; Jill M Mhyre; Elena V Kuklina; William M Callaghan; Brian T Bateman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  FAST-SeqS: a simple and efficient method for the detection of aneuploidy by massively parallel sequencing.

Authors:  Isaac Kinde; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  First Trimester Combined Test (FTCT) as a Predictor of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Federica Visconti; Paola Quaresima; Eusebio Chiefari; Patrizia Caroleo; Biagio Arcidiacono; Luigi Puccio; Maria Mirabelli; Daniela P Foti; Costantino Di Carlo; Raffaella Vero; Antonio Brunetti
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Comparison of different strategies in prenatal screening for Down's syndrome: cost effectiveness analysis of computer simulation.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Geneviève Gagné; Emmanuel Bujold; Daniel Douillard; Jean-Claude Forest; Daniel Reinharz; François Rousseau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-02-13

9.  Older mothers and increased impact of prenatal screening: stable livebirth prevalence of trisomy 21 in the Netherlands for the period 2000-2013.

Authors:  Maurike D de Groot-van der Mooren; Saskia Tamminga; Dick Oepkes; Michel E Weijerman; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Cohort Study in Qingdao, China.

Authors:  Guoju Li; Tao Wei; Wei Ni; Ai Zhang; Jun Zhang; Yuhan Xing; Quansheng Xing
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.