Literature DB >> 15636995

Serious complications associated with epidural/spinal blockade in obstetrics: a two-year prospective study.

D B Scott1, M E Tunstall.   

Abstract

A prospective study of complications associated with epidural and spinal blockade in obstetrics was carried out during the years 1990 and 1991. 79 obstetric units in the United Kingdom took part. These units had a total of 467 491 deliveries during the two years. 108 133 mothers received epidural blockade and 14856 received spinal blockade. 22% of all mothers received epidural analgesia in labour, and 50% of caesarean sections were performed under either epidural or spinal anaesthesia. 128 complications (not including post dural puncture headache) were reported. Of these, 46 were neuropathies involving a single spinal or peripheral nerve. 26 unexpectedly high blockades were encountered. Backache was reported in 21 mothers and urinary retention in 8. Cardiac arrest occurred twice. Although resuscitation restored normal cardiac function in both cases, one patient was decerebrate and died some days later. Postmortem examination revealed evidence of amniotic fluid embolus. 20 reports were classified as 'miscellaneous' and presented individual clinical diagnoses. The overall complication rate (excluding post dural puncture headache) was approximately 1 per thousand.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 15636995     DOI: 10.1016/0959-289x(95)82967-f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth        ISSN: 0959-289X            Impact factor:   2.603


  10 in total

Review 1.  Labour analgesia. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  R L Eberle; M C Norris
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Economic considerations related to providing adequate pain relief for women in labour: comparison of epidural and intravenous analgesia.

Authors:  Cecil Huang; Alex Macario
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Epidural anaesthesia and spinal haematoma.

Authors:  H Wulf
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Anesthesia-related adverse events in obstetric patients: a population-based study in Canada.

Authors:  Leyla Baghirzada; David Archer; Andrew Walker; Mrinalini Balki
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 5.063

5.  Epidemiology of anesthesia-related complications in labor and delivery, New York State, 2002-2005.

Authors:  Khadeen Cheesman; Joanne E Brady; Pamela Flood; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Transient brachial monoparesis following epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Authors:  Tejesh C Anandaswamy; Manjunath A Chikkapillappa; Geetha C Rajappa; Shivakumar Shivanna
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10

7.  Foot drop after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: a case report.

Authors:  Ali Dastkhosh; Majid Razavi; Mehryar Taghavi Gilani
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2018-08-10

Review 8.  Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  K Ng; J Parsons; A M Cyna; P Middleton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004

9.  Effects of Simulation Study of High Neuraxial Block During Epidural Analgesia for Labor Pain on Pre/Posttest Evaluation in Junior Clinical Trainees.

Authors:  Nobutaka Kariya; Yui Kawasaki; Hiroai Okutani; Takahiko Kaneko; Ryusuke Ueki; Munetaka Hirose
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-02-17

10.  [Foot drop: an iatrogenic complication of spinal anesthesia].

Authors:  Vipin Kumar Goyal; Vijay Mathur
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-01-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.