Literature DB >> 15635678

Improved confidence intervals for the sensitivity at a fixed level of specificity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test.

Xiao-Hua Zhou1, Gengsheng Qin.   

Abstract

For a continuous-scale diagnostic test, it is of interest to construct a confidence interval for the sensitivity of the diagnostic test at the cut-off that yields a predetermined level of its specificity (for example, 80, 90 or 95 per cent). In this paper we propose two new intervals for the sensitivity of a continuous-scale diagnostic test at a fixed level of specificity. We then conduct simulation studies to compare the relative performance of these two intervals with the best existing BCa bootstrap interval, proposed by Platt et al. Our simulation results show that the newly proposed intervals are better than the BCa bootstrap interval in terms of coverage accuracy and interval length. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15635678     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  12 in total

1.  Parametric and non-parametric confidence intervals of the probability of identifying early disease stage given sensitivity to full disease and specificity with three ordinal diagnostic groups.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian; Alan Hutson; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Semiparametric Inference for ROC Curves with Censoring.

Authors:  Hua Liang; Yong Zhou
Journal:  Scand Stat Theory Appl       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 1.396

3.  A Smooth Nonparametric Approach to Determining Cut-Points of A Continuous Scale.

Authors:  Zhiping Qiu; Limin Peng; Amita Manatunga; Ying Guo
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 1.681

4.  Prediction of imminent, severe deterioration of children with parallel circulations using real-time processing of physiologic data.

Authors:  Craig G Rusin; Sebastian I Acosta; Lara S Shekerdemian; Eric L Vu; Aarti C Bavare; Risa B Myers; Lance W Patterson; Ken M Brady; Daniel J Penny
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Empirical Likelihood-Based Confidence Interval of ROC Curves.

Authors:  Haiyan Su; Yongsong Qin; Hua Liang
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 1.452

6.  Confidence Interval Estimation for Sensitivity to the Early Diseased Stage Based on Empirical Likelihood.

Authors:  Tuochuan Dong; Lili Tian
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.051

7.  A prediction model for the response to oral labetalol for the treatment of antenatal hypertension.

Authors:  D Stott; M Bolten; M Salman; D Paraschiv; A Douiri; N A Kametas
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.012

8.  Empirical Likelihood Approaches to Two-Group Comparisons of Upper Quantiles Applied to Biomedical Data.

Authors:  Jihnhee Yu; Albert Vexler; Alan D Hutson; Heinz Baumann
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.452

9.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Prostate Health Index to Detect Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Biopsy Naïve Men.

Authors:  Claire de la Calle; Dattatraya Patil; John T Wei; Douglas S Scherr; Lori Sokoll; Daniel W Chan; Javed Siddiqui; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Mark A Rubin; Martin G Sanda
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Performance of lipid fingerprint-based MALDI-ToF for the diagnosis of mycobacterial infections.

Authors:  Ximena Gonzalo; Agnieszka Broda; Francis Drobniewski; Gerald Larrouy-Maumus
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 8.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.