Literature DB >> 15635560

Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.

Cheng-Jen Chuong1, Bhushan Borotikar, Carina Schwartz-Dabney, Douglas P Sinn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Using finite element (FE) computer model simulation, we compared the mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) through the use of 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on the reconstructed geometry from computed tomography scans of dry adult skull with a mandibular deformity requiring surgical correction, we developed 3-dimensional FE models that simulate BSSRO with 2 different techniques to stabilize the osteotomy. Technique 1 uses 3 bicortical titanium screws. Technique 2 uses a curved titanium plate with 4 monocortical screws. Five different load cases were applied to the mandible after the simulated BSSRO with the mandible being constrained at both temporomandibular joints. To evaluate the efficacy of these 2 stabilization techniques, we compared 1) the resulting deflections at the central incisor, 2) the mechanical stresses developed in the bone in the vicinity of the stabilizing implants, and 3) the mechanical stresses developed within the screw/plating system themselves.
RESULTS: Technique 1, using 3 bicortical titanium screws, leads to smaller deflections at the central incisor for all 5 load cases, suggesting higher mechanical stability. Technique 1 also leads to lower mechanical stresses in the bone and in the implanted screws, whereas technique 2 is associated with higher values in each of these quantities.
CONCLUSIONS: To stabilize osteotomies after a 3-dimensional simulated BSSRO, 3 bicortical screws forming an inverted-L configuration are shown to offer more effective load transmission in the mandibular construct. This technique, when examined in an FE model, leads to higher stability with lower mechanical stresses in the bone near the bicortical screws.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15635560     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  9 in total

1.  Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Hiromasa Takahashi; Shigeaki Moriyama; Haruhiko Furuta; Hisao Matsunaga; Yuki Sakamoto; Toshihiro Kikuta
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.151

2.  Evaluating the Effect of Minimizing Screws on Stabilization of Symphysis Mandibular Fracture by 3D Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Ghias Kharmanda; Mohamed-Yaser Kharma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-04-21

3.  Comparison of Stability of Fracture Segments in Mandible Fracture Treated with Different Designs of Mini-Plates Using FEM Analysis.

Authors:  Udupikrishna Joshi; Manju Kurakar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-04-16

4.  An in vitro comparison between two different designs of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Valdir Cabral Andrade; Leonardo Flores Luthi; Fabio Loureiro Sato; Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; Jose Ricardo Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-23

5.  Mechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems used in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

Authors:  Zarina Tatia Barbosa Vieira Santos; Douglas Rangel Goulart; Eder Alberto Sigua-Rodriguez; Leandro Pozzer; Sergio Olate; José Ricardo Albergaria-Barbosa
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Botulinum toxin-A injection into the anterior belly of the digastric muscle for the prevention of post-operative open bite in class II malocclusions: a case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yei-Jin Kang; Bong Kuen Cha; Dong Soon Choi; In San Jang; Seong-Gon Kim
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04-26

7.  Comparison of strengths of five internal fixation methods used after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Farzin Sarkarat; Atiye Ahmady; Farzam Farahmand; Ali Fateh; Roozbeh Kahali; Amir Nourani; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

8.  Assessment of Lingual Stability in Mandible Fracture: Monocortical Versus Bicortical Fixation Using FEM Analysis.

Authors:  Udupikrishna Joshi; Manju Kurakar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-12-16

Review 9.  TMJ response to mandibular advancement surgery: an overview of risk factors.

Authors:  José Valladares-Neto; Lucia Helena Cevidanes; Wesley Cabral Rocha; Guilherme de Araújo Almeida; João Batista de Paiva; José Rino-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.