Literature DB >> 15635558

The impact of intravenous corticosteroids with third molar surgery in patients at high risk for delayed health-related quality of life and clinical recovery.

Paul S Tiwana1, Susan P Foy, Daniel A Shugars, Robert D Marciani, Shawn M Conrad, Ceib Phillips, Raymond P White.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare recovery for clinical and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes after third molar surgery in patients predicted to be at risk for delayed recovery, treated with or without intravenous (IV) corticosteroids at surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients at least 18 years of age and with all 4 third molars below the occlusal plane were given IV corticosteroids just before third molar surgery. Clinical and HRQOL outcomes of these patients were compared with those of a nonconcurrent control group who did not receive corticosteroids. No antibiotics were administered. The control group was selected using the same criteria and treated under the same surgical protocol as the corticosteroid group. Differences between the groups were assessed with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel row mean score statistics.
RESULTS: Sixty patients were in each cohort. The incidence of delayed clinical recovery, a postsurgery visit with treatment, was higher in the control group compared with the corticosteroid group. In the corticosteroid group, 6 patients (10%) had 1 postsurgery visit with treatment. In the control group without corticosteroids, 17 patients (28%) had at least 1 postsurgery visit with treatment (P = .01). Compared with the control group, nausea tended to bother patients less on postsurgery day 1 (P = .07); sleep was improved on postsurgery days 1 through 4 (P < .05). Though not statistically significant, corticosteroids reduced the patients reported recovery by at least 1 day for pain, lifestyle, and oral function.
CONCLUSION: Administration of IV corticosteroids before third molar surgery without antibiotics does not hamper clinical recovery even when healthy adult patients are predicted to have delayed recovery. Overall, IV corticosteroid administration had a limited, but beneficial effect on HRQOL outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15635558     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.01.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  22 in total

1.  Validation of data on the use of twin mix in minor oral surgery: comparative evaluation of efficacy of twin mix versus 2 % lignocaine with 1:200000 epinephrine based on power analysis and an UV spectrometry study for chemical stability of the mixture.

Authors:  Darpan Bhargava; Ashwini Deshpande; Piush Khare; Sharad P Pandey; Niharika Thakur
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-03-21

Review 2.  Third molar removal and its impact on quality of life: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Duarte-Rodrigues; Ednele Fabyene Primo Miranda; Taiane Oliveira Souza; Haroldo Neves de Paiva; Saulo Gabriel Moreira Falci; Endi Lanza Galvão
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Pre- and postoperative management techniques. Before and after. Part 2: the removal of third molars.

Authors:  J Mansoor
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Oral health-related quality of life following third molar surgery with or without application of ice pack therapy.

Authors:  Adebayo A Ibikunle; Wasiu L Adeyemo
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-05-03

5.  High performance liquid chromatography determination of dexamethasone in plasma to evaluate its systemic absorption following intra-space pterygomandibular injection of twin-mix (mixture of 2 % lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4 mg dexamethasone): randomized control trial.

Authors:  Darpan Bhargava; Ashwini Deshpande; Shaji Thomas; Yogesh Sharma; Piush Khare; Sanjeev Kumar Sahu; Suyash Dubey; Ankit Pandey; K Sreekumar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

6.  Pre-emptive effect of dexamethasone injection and consumption on post-operative swelling, pain, and trismus after third molar surgery. A prospective, double blind and randomized study.

Authors:  Pradeep D Chaudhary; Sanjay Rastogi; Prashant Gupta; B Niranjanaprasad Indra; Roy Thomas; Rupshikha Choudhury
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-03-05

7.  A prospective randomized double-blind study to assess the latency and efficacy of twin-mix and 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine in surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars: a pilot study.

Authors:  Darpan Bhargava; K Sreekumar; Shobhit Rastogi; Ashwini Deshpande; Nupur Chakravorty
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-11-10

8.  Cryotherapy and topical minocycline as adjunctive measures to control pain after third molar surgery: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Savannah Gelesko; Leann Long; Jan Faulk; Ceib Phillips; Carolyn Dicus; Raymond P White
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Single-Dose of Submucosal Injection of Dexamethasone Affects the Post Operative Quality of Life After Third Molar Surgery.

Authors:  Saroj Prasad Deo
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-12-07

10.  Effectiveness of submucosal dexamethasone to control postoperative pain & swelling in apicectomy of maxillary anterior teeth.

Authors:  Shahzad Ali Shah; Irfanullah Khan; Humera Shahzad Shah
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.