Literature DB >> 15635475

Methods for measuring agreement: glucose levels in gingival crevice blood.

Hans-Peter Müller1, Ebrahim Behbehani.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare conclusions drawn by two different methods for comparison of blood glucose determination in capillary fingerstick blood (CFB) and gingival crevice blood (GCB). Glucose levels in CFB and GCB oozing from the gingiva after periodontal probing were measured in 31 patients with gingivitis or periodontitis using a novel, very sensitive self-monitoring device (Freestyle, TheraSense Inc.) developed for off-finger tip glucose testing. Correlation analysis revealed that measurements of glucose levels in CFB from left and right finger tips were highly correlated pointing to excellent performance of the device, whereas CFB and GCB measurements were moderately, but highly significantly, correlated. A thorough analysis of agreement revealed, on the other hand, questionable performance of the device for screening hypoglycaemic patients. The mean difference of measurements in CFB samples was +3.2+/-12.7 mg/dl. The 95% limits of agreement were -21.7 and +28.2. The mean difference of glucose determination in CFB and GCB samples was -22.0+/-26.6 mg/dl, and limits of agreement were -74.4 and +30.1. By plotting differences on means of measurements and doing linear regression analysis no systematic trend of change in differences with increasing mean of measurements was ascertained. Analysis of agreement revealed that performance of the Freestyle measuring device yielded considerably large limits of agreement, and gingival crevice blood cannot be recommended for measuring blood glucose levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15635475     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-004-0290-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  13 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose by error grid analysis: comment on constructing the "upper A-line".

Authors:  D Stöckl; K Dewitte; C Fierens; L M Thienpont
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Physiological influences on off-finger glucose testing.

Authors:  G McGarraugh; D Price; S Schwartz; R Weinstein
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts).

Authors:  L M Koran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-10-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Diabetes and periodontal diseases. Committee on Research, Science and Therapy. American Academy of Periodontology.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Debra M Lee; Sandra E Weinert; Earl E Miller
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  In-dental-office screening for diabetes mellitus using gingival crevicular blood.

Authors:  T Beikler; A Kuczek; G Petersilka; T F Flemmig
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 8.728

10.  Gingival crevicular blood for assessment of blood glucose in diabetic patients.

Authors:  R C Parker; J W Rapley; W Isley; P Spencer; W J Killoy
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.993

View more
  8 in total

1.  Repeatability of ultrasonic determination of gingival thickness.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Müller; Kefah M Barrieshi-Nusair; Eija Könönen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Gingival bleeding on repeat probing after different time intervals in plaque-induced gingivitis.

Authors:  H P Müller; K M Barrieshi-Nusair
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-07-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Screening for diabetes mellitus using gingival crevicular blood with the help of a self-monitoring device.

Authors:  Subodh Gaikwad; Varsha Jadhav; Abhijit Gurav; Abhijeet R Shete; Hitesh M Dearda
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  In-dental office screening for diabetes mellitus using gingival crevicular blood.

Authors:  M V Ramoji Rao; M Vinay C Reddy; Shyam S Sunder; Balaram Kolasani; Garipineni Kiranmai; K Ramesh Kumar
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2014-12

5.  Gingival crevicular blood: As a non-invasive screening tool for diabetes mellitus in dental clinics.

Authors:  Neema Shetty; Rajesh Shankarapillai; Lalit Kumar Mathur; Balaji Manohar; Aditi Mathur; Meetu Jain
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-07

6.  Characteristics of inflammation common to both diabetes and periodontitis: are predictive diagnosis and targeted preventive measures possible?

Authors:  Philip J Hanes; Ranjitha Krishna
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Correlations between gingival crevicular blood glucose and capillary blood glucose: A preliminary report.

Authors:  Siluvai Sibyl; Darshana Bennadi; Nandita Kshetrimayum; Maurya Manjunath
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

8.  Gingival Crevicular Blood as a Potential Screening Tool: A Cross Sectional Comparative Study.

Authors:  Biagio Rapone; Elisabetta Ferrara; Luigi Santacroce; Skender Topi; Ilaria Converti; Antonio Gnoni; Antonio Scarano; Salvatore Scacco
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.