Literature DB >> 15632795

Measuring preferences for schizophrenia outcomes with the time tradeoff method.

Martha Shumway1, Tandy L Chouljian, Cynthia L Battle.   

Abstract

Measuring preferences for schizophrenia outcomes facilitates meaningful integration of multiple outcome measures and multiple perspectives on treatment outcomes. The Time Tradeoff (TTO) technique, specifically developed for measuring health state preferences, is used widely in health research, but some evidence suggests that the TTO may work less well with schizophrenia than with other health conditions. This study tested the hypotheses that tailoring the time frame of the standard TTO to the course of schizophrenia and simplifying its presentation format would improve its feasibility and efficiency. Forty clinicians provided TTO ratings using 1 of 4 combinations of time frame and presentation format. Numeric ratings and quantitative and qualitative measures of feasibility showed that while participants preferred the simpler format, none of the alterations improved feasibility. Participants' ratings were prone to logical inconsistencies and participants found all 4 versions of the TTO confusing and poorly suited to the context of schizophrenia treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632795     DOI: 10.1007/BF02287325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  25 in total

1.  Paraphrase procedures for assessing comprehension of health outcome measures: an illustration from schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Martha Shumway; Tandy L Chouljian; Francine Rozewicz
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Differences in health values among patients, family members, and providers for outcomes in schizophrenia.

Authors:  L A Lenert; J Ziegler; T Lee; R Sommi; R Mahmoud
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Assessing preferences for schizophrenia outcomes: comprehension and decision strategies in three assessment methods.

Authors:  Martha Shumway; Tetine Sentell; Tandy Chouljian; Jen Tellier; Francine Rozewicz; Michele Okun
Journal:  Ment Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-09

4.  Quality of life in epilepsy: comparison of four preference measures.

Authors:  K Stavem
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.045

5.  The effect of search procedures on utility elicitations.

Authors:  L A Lenert; D J Cher; M K Goldstein; M R Bergen; A Garber
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1998 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 6.  Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G W Torrance
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  Assessing the performance of utility techniques in the absence of a gold standard.

Authors:  R B Giesler; C M Ashton; B Brody; M M Byrne; K Cook; J M Geraci; M Hanita; J Souchek; N P Wray
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Measuring heart patients' willingness to pay for changes in angina symptoms.

Authors:  L G Chestnut; L R Keller; W E Lambert; R D Rowe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Economic and health state utility determinations for schizophrenic patients treated with risperidone or haloperidol.

Authors:  G Chouinard; P S Albright
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.153

10.  Cost-utility analysis in schizophrenia.

Authors:  A G Awad; L P Voruganti
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  1 in total

1.  An examination of fulfilled housing preferences and quality of life among homeless persons with mental illness and/or substance use disorders.

Authors:  Maria O'Connell; Robert Rosenheck; Wesley Kasprow; Linda Frisman
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.505

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.