OBJECTIVE: To provide health care organizations with a benchmark to measure pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence. SUBJECTS: Medical, surgical, and intensive care unit patients at participating health care organizations. DESIGN: Pressure ulcer prevalence was measured during a predetermined 24-hour period at each participating health care organization, using a standardized data collection form. Incidence was measured over the average length of stay determined for each participating health care organization. Patient demographics, pressure ulcer stages, pressure ulcer locations, and contributing factors were collected during the study. Collected data forms were audited prior to being submitted to a central site for database entry, analysis, and report generation. RESULTS: Pressure ulcer prevalence ranged from a low of 14% (2001 and 2002) to a high of 17% (1999). Incidence ranged from a low of 7% (2001, 2003, 2004) to a high of 9% (2000). Comprehensive reports were delivered to the participating health care organizations, with each health care organization's data compiled to create a comparison database. CONCLUSION: A standardized methodology for prevalence and incidence study data collection/reporting has been developed and used in successive studies and years. This provides a tool to help health care organizations measure the effectiveness of interventions, improve patient outcomes on an ongoing basis, and begin trending analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To provide health care organizations with a benchmark to measure pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence. SUBJECTS: Medical, surgical, and intensive care unit patients at participating health care organizations. DESIGN: Pressure ulcer prevalence was measured during a predetermined 24-hour period at each participating health care organization, using a standardized data collection form. Incidence was measured over the average length of stay determined for each participating health care organization. Patient demographics, pressure ulcer stages, pressure ulcer locations, and contributing factors were collected during the study. Collected data forms were audited prior to being submitted to a central site for database entry, analysis, and report generation. RESULTS: Pressure ulcer prevalence ranged from a low of 14% (2001 and 2002) to a high of 17% (1999). Incidence ranged from a low of 7% (2001, 2003, 2004) to a high of 9% (2000). Comprehensive reports were delivered to the participating health care organizations, with each health care organization's data compiled to create a comparison database. CONCLUSION: A standardized methodology for prevalence and incidence study data collection/reporting has been developed and used in successive studies and years. This provides a tool to help health care organizations measure the effectiveness of interventions, improve patient outcomes on an ongoing basis, and begin trending analysis.
Authors: Mona M Baharestani; Joyce M Black; Keryln Carville; Michael Clark; Janet E Cuddigan; Carol Dealey; Tom Defloor; Keith G Harding; Nils A Lahmann; Maarten J Lubbers; Courtney H Lyder; Takehiko Ohura; Heather L Orsted; Steve I Reger; Marco Romanelli; Hiromi Sanada Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.315