Literature DB >> 15632229

The surgical assessment unit--effective strategy for improvement of the emergency surgical pathway?

M S Mohamed1, G R Mufti.   

Abstract

A special unit was set up in an associate teaching hospital to provide a fast-track route for the assessment of acute adult surgical and urological referrals. During an audit period of eight weeks, this surgical assessment unit had 550 referrals, of which 196 (36%) came via the accident and emergency (A&E) department; the other 354 came directly from general practitioners or other hospital departments. Mondays, Tuesdays and Fridays were the busiest days of the week; 57% of all patients arrived between 8 am and 5 pm. 68% were seen by a doctor within 1 hour of their arrival. 68% were either discharged or admitted to the main surgical wards within 4 hours. The study showed that, over the course of a year, the surgical assessment unit might divert some 2301 patients away from the A&E department. To achieve this total it would need to be open and appropriately staffed 24 hours a day. Such a unit offers a strategy for limiting the A&E workload and streamlining the assessment of patients with surgical and urological emergencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632229      PMCID: PMC1079231          DOI: 10.1177/014107680509800105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  5 in total

1.  The next millennium--are we becoming emergency surgeons? A seven year audit of surgical and urological admissions in a rural district general hospital.

Authors:  C Chezhian; J Pye; L R Jenkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  A 25-year study of emergency surgical admissions.

Authors:  W B Campbell; E J K Lee; K Van de Sijpe; J Gooding; M J Cooper
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Audit of general practitioner referrals to a surgical assessment unit: new methods to improve the efficacy of the acute surgical service.

Authors:  K A Dookeran; I Bain; V Moshakis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Changes in emergency surgery between 1973 and 1982: audit of the workload of one surgical team.

Authors:  E P Perry; J C Crisp; D F Watkin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  The continuing rise in emergency admissions.

Authors:  S Capewell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-20
  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Magnitude of non-operative surgical emergency admissions; service implications for surgical and radiological practice.

Authors:  R M Heaney; I Reynolds; R S Ryan; I Khan; W Khan; R Waldron; K Barry
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 2.  A systematic review of dedicated models of care for emergency urological patients.

Authors:  Ned Kinnear; Matheesha Herath; Dylan Barnett; Derek Hennessey; Christopher Dobbins; Tarik Sammour; James Moore
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2020-06-26

3.  Patient satisfaction following emergency admission via a surgical assessment unit and an emergency department.

Authors:  B Forrestal; T Hynes; M Clarke-Moloney; P Coyle; E Boyle; P Burke; S R Walsh; G Quin; P A Grace
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  The dedicated emergency surgeon: towards consultant-based acute surgical admissions.

Authors:  P G Sorelli; N S El-Masry; P M Dawson; N A Theodorou
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Hybrid Surgical Hot Clinic (HSHC): Evaluation of Surgical Hot Clinic Services during COVID-19 Lockdown.

Authors:  Adeel Abbas Dhahri; Raheel Ahmad; Bilal Fazal Shaikh; Olubunmi Sajinyan; Ibrahim Warrag; Maitreyi Patel; Bogdan Ivanov
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.