R M Heaney1, I Reynolds2, R S Ryan3, I Khan2, W Khan2, R Waldron2, K Barry2,4. 1. Department of Surgery, Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, Co. Mayo, Ireland. heaneyr@tcd.ie. 2. Department of Surgery, Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, Co. Mayo, Ireland. 3. Department of Radiology, Mayo University Hospital, Castlebar, Co. Mayo, Ireland. 4. Discipline of Surgery, National University of Ireland Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Financial sustainability is an area of sharp ongoing focus across the broad spectrum of the Irish Health Service. Recent attention has been drawn to the financial implications of non-operative surgical admissions, suggesting that some of these may be unnecessary. AIMS: In this study, we aim to determine the volume of emergency surgical admissions to Mayo University Hospital (MUH), in particular, to identify the scale of non-operative admissions and to assess the wider inherent implications for acute hospital services. METHODS: An electronic handover system for emergency surgical admissions was introduced in MUH in September 2014. All surgical admissions from September 1st 2014 to August 31st 2015 were identified from this prospectively maintained database. HIPE (Hospital Inpatient Enquiry) data were not used in this study. Theatre logbooks confirmed those patients who required operative intervention. RESULTS: 1466 patients were admitted as emergencies during the study period. 58 % (850) were male and median age was 48 years (0-100). Average length of stay was 5 days (range 1-125). 327 patients (22.3 %) required operative intervention. The most commonly performed procedure was appendicectomy (52.5 %). 48 (3.3 %) patients were transferred to other hospitals. 131 (8.9 %) admissions related to the acute urological conditions. Of the 1466 admissions, 546 underwent a CT scan, while 342 patients proceeded to ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Almost 80 % of all surgical emergency admissions were discharged without undergoing a formal operative procedure while generating a significant workload for the radiology department. Changes in working practices and hospital network structures will be required to reduce the burden of non-operative emergency admissions.
BACKGROUND: Financial sustainability is an area of sharp ongoing focus across the broad spectrum of the Irish Health Service. Recent attention has been drawn to the financial implications of non-operative surgical admissions, suggesting that some of these may be unnecessary. AIMS: In this study, we aim to determine the volume of emergency surgical admissions to Mayo University Hospital (MUH), in particular, to identify the scale of non-operative admissions and to assess the wider inherent implications for acute hospital services. METHODS: An electronic handover system for emergency surgical admissions was introduced in MUH in September 2014. All surgical admissions from September 1st 2014 to August 31st 2015 were identified from this prospectively maintained database. HIPE (Hospital Inpatient Enquiry) data were not used in this study. Theatre logbooks confirmed those patients who required operative intervention. RESULTS: 1466 patients were admitted as emergencies during the study period. 58 % (850) were male and median age was 48 years (0-100). Average length of stay was 5 days (range 1-125). 327 patients (22.3 %) required operative intervention. The most commonly performed procedure was appendicectomy (52.5 %). 48 (3.3 %) patients were transferred to other hospitals. 131 (8.9 %) admissions related to the acute urological conditions. Of the 1466 admissions, 546 underwent a CT scan, while 342 patients proceeded to ultrasound. CONCLUSION: Almost 80 % of all surgical emergency admissions were discharged without undergoing a formal operative procedure while generating a significant workload for the radiology department. Changes in working practices and hospital network structures will be required to reduce the burden of non-operative emergency admissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Admissions; Emergency; Non-operative; Practice implications
Authors: Seamus McHugh; Mark Corrigan; Athar Sheikh; Elaine Lehane; William Tanner; Arnold Hill Journal: World J Surg Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: D A Healy; D P McCartan; P A Grace; A Aziz; F Dermody; M Clarke Moloney; J C Coffey; S R Walsh; P E Burke Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 1.568
Authors: Hani H Abujudeh; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pamela M McMahon; William Binder; Robert A Novelline; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.959