Literature DB >> 15630661

Resistance to disruption and gapping of peripheral nerve repairs: an in vitro biomechanical assessment of techniques.

C L F Temple1, D C Ross, C E Dunning, J A Johnson.   

Abstract

One potential cause of suboptimal results after nerve repair is disruption or gapping of the neurorrhaphy in the postoperative period. This study assesses the biomechanical strength of five nerve repair techniques: fibrin glue, simple epineurial sutures, and three other novel neurorrhaphy methods. Fifty rabbit sciatic nerve segments were divided and repaired utilizing one of five different methods, producing five groups of ten specimens. Fibrin glue and four epineurial suture techniques (simple, horizontal mattress, "Tajima," "Bunnell") were employed. Repaired nerve segments were ramp-loaded to failure on an Instron 8300 materials-testing machine at a displacement rate of 5 mm/min. Gapping at the repair site was captured using high-resolution video. Differences among the five groups were assessed for significance using ANOVA and Fisher's protected least squares differences post-hoc testing. The mean force to produce disruption was higher for mattress suture repairs relative to simple repairs, but not significantly so (p = 0.31). Both were significantly stronger than fibrin glue repairs (p < 0.0001). "Tajima" and "Bunnell" repairs were both statistically stronger than glue (p < 0.0001), simple (p < 0.0001), or mattress (p = 0.0004) repairs, but not significantly different from one another (p = 0.48). Data for gapping at the repair site were similar with all suture techniques outperforming fibrin glue (p = 0.003). "Bunnell" repairs demonstrated the most resistance to gapping, compared to glue (p < 0.0001), simple (p = 0.0001), mattress (p = 0.007) and "Tajima" repairs (p = 0.01). These data demonstrate that repairs done utilizing fibrin glue are significantly weaker than all types of suture repairs. Two novel techniques for nerve repair (epineurial "Tajima" and "Bunnell") are significantly more resistant to disruption and gapping. Further evaluation to assess the effect of these repair techniques on function is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15630661     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-861525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg        ISSN: 0743-684X            Impact factor:   2.873


  15 in total

1.  Fibrin Glue Increases the Tensile Strength of Conduit-Assisted Primary Digital Nerve Repair.

Authors:  Jessica R Childe; Steven Regal; Patrick Schimoler; Alexander Kharlamov; Mark C Miller; Peter Tang
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 2.  Nerve repair: toward a sutureless approach.

Authors:  Matthew J Barton; John W Morley; Marcus A Stoodley; Antonio Lauto; David A Mahns
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Surgeon perspectives on alternative nerve repair techniques.

Authors:  Anthony Owusu; Brian Mayeda; Jonathan Isaacs
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2014-03

4.  Assessment of Conduit-Assisted Primary Nerve Repair Strength With Varying Suture Size, Number, and Location.

Authors:  Nikola Babovic; Derek Klaus; Matthew J Schessler; Patrick J Schimoler; Alexander Kharlamov; Mark C Miller; Peter Tang
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  A novel conduit-based coaptation device for primary nerve repair.

Authors:  Ravinder Bamba; D Colton Riley; Nathaniel D Kelm; Nancy Cardwell; Alonda C Pollins; Ashkan Afshari; Lyly Nguyen; Richard D Dortch; Wesley P Thayer
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.292

6.  Biomechanical Testing of a Novel Device for Sutureless Nerve Repair.

Authors:  Geetanjali S Bendale; Maximilian Sonntag; Isaac P Clements; Jonathan E Isaacs
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.273

7.  Effect of laser therapy (660 nm) on recovery of the sciatic nerve in rats after injury through neurotmesis followed by epineural anastomosis.

Authors:  Filipe Abdalla dos Reis; Ana Carulina Guimarães Belchior; Paulo de Tarso Camillo de Carvalho; Baldomero Antônio Kato da Silva; Daniel Martins Pereira; Iandara Schettert Silva; Renata Amadei Nicolau
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.161

8.  Photocrosslinkable Gelatin/Tropoelastin Hydrogel Adhesives for Peripheral Nerve Repair.

Authors:  Jonathan R Soucy; Ehsan Shirzaei Sani; Roberto Portillo Lara; David Diaz; Felipe Dias; Anthony S Weiss; Abigail N Koppes; Ryan A Koppes; Nasim Annabi
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Biomechanical properties of the sciatic nerve following repair: effects of topical application of hyaluronic acid or tacrolimus.

Authors:  Agon Y Mekaj; Arsim A Morina; Shpetim Lajqi; Suzana Manxhuka-Kerliu; Fatos M Kelmendi; Shkelzen B Duci
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

10.  Median and Digital Nerve In Situ Tension in the Hand.

Authors:  Jacob T Didesch; Patrick J Schimoler; Mark Carl Miller; Peter Tang
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2020-02-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.