Literature DB >> 35850519

Biomechanical Testing of a Novel Device for Sutureless Nerve Repair.

Geetanjali S Bendale1, Maximilian Sonntag2, Isaac P Clements2, Jonathan E Isaacs1.   

Abstract

Suboptimal nerve end alignment achieved with conventional nerve repair techniques may contribute to poor clinical outcomes. In this study, we introduce Nerve Tape®, a novel nerve repair device that integrates flexible columns of Nitinol microhooks within a biologic backing to entubulate, align, and secure approximated nerve ends. This study compares the repair strength of Nerve Tape with that of conventional microsuture repairs. Thirty small (2 mm) and 30 large (7 mm) diameter human cadaveric nerves were transected and repaired utilizing Nerve Tape or appropriate microsuture technique. Biomechanical testing was performed using a horizontal tensile tester. The repaired nerves were loaded until failure at a distraction rate of 40 mm/min, and the maximum failure load was determined. In the small nerve groups, the load-to-failure for Nerve Tape repairs (2.33 ± 0.66 N) was significantly higher than for suture repairs (1.22 ± 0.52 N; p < 0.05). In the large nerve groups, no significant difference in load-to-failure was found between Nerve Tape (7.45 ± 2.66 N) and suture repairs (5.82 ± 1.59 N: p = 0.12). Suture repairs tended to fail by rupture, whereas Nerve Tape failures resulted from microhook pullout. Nerve Tape is a novel nerve coaptation device that provides mechanical repair strength equal or greater to clinically relevant microsuture repairs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical testing; peripheral nerve; repair strength; sutureless nerve repair

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35850519      PMCID: PMC9526470          DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2022.0080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods        ISSN: 1937-3384            Impact factor:   3.273


  40 in total

Review 1.  Surface, corrosion and biocompatibility aspects of Nitinol as an implant material.

Authors:  Svetlana A Shabalovskaya
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.300

Review 2.  Comparison of magnification in primary digital nerve repair: literature review, survey of practice trends, and assessment of 90 cadaveric repairs.

Authors:  Derek T Bernstein; Kristy L Hamilton; Christian Foy; Nancy J Petersen; David T Netscher
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Comparison of microsurgical suture with fibrin glue connection of the sciatic nerve in rabbits.

Authors:  M Sames; J Blahos; R Rokyta; V Benes
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.881

4.  Mesh epineurial splinting for late median nerve repair in older patients: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Jayme Augusto Bertelli; Paulo Roberto Kechele; Marcos Flávio Ghizoni; Tânia S Fröde
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.425

Review 5.  Refinements of nerve repair with connector-assisted coaptation.

Authors:  Ivica Ducic; Bauback Safa; Erick DeVinney
Journal:  Microsurgery       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.425

6.  Technical Assessment of Connector-Assisted Nerve Repair.

Authors:  Jonathan Isaacs; Bauback Safa; Peter J Evans; Jeffrey Greenberg
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Results of primary repair of ulnar and median nerve injuries at the wrist: an evaluation of sensibility and motor recovery.

Authors:  S J Jongen; R Van Twisk
Journal:  Neth J Surg       Date:  1988-06

8.  Evaluation of fibrin glue in rat sciatic nerve repairs.

Authors:  N I Cruz; N Debs; R E Fiol
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Mechanical anastomosis of nerves: a histological and functional comparison to conventional suturing.

Authors:  C D Prevel; B L Eppley; M McCarty; C Brock
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Median and ulnar nerve injuries: a meta-analysis of predictors of motor and sensory recovery after modern microsurgical nerve repair.

Authors:  Aleid C J Ruijs; Jean-Bart Jaquet; Sandra Kalmijn; Henk Giele; Steven E R Hovius
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.