Literature DB >> 15630383

Effects of a twenty-four hour call period on resident performance during simulated endoscopic sinus surgery in an accreditation council for graduate medical education-compliant training program.

David M Jakubowicz1, Erin M Price, Harrison J Glassman, Anthony J G Gallagher, Neil Mandava, Walter P Ralph, Marvin P Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Since the early 1990s, extended resident work hours have undergone increasing scrutiny. Although previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results regarding cognitive decline secondary to fatigue, few studies have specifically examined the effects of fatigue on surgical performance. No previous studies have examined resident performance under current Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work-hour guidelines that limit residents to an average number of work hours of 80 hours per week. The study sought to determine whether an endoscopic sinus surgery simulator (ES3) measured performance changes before and after a 24-hour on-call period in residents following mandated work-hour limitations. STUDY
DESIGN: Case control, crossover trial at a Level I trauma center.
METHODS: Eight general surgical residents were trained on the novice mode of the ES3. These residents were then tested twice both before and after on-call duties. Performance and hazard scores were compared using a paired t test.
RESULTS: No statistically significant change in the number of errors, time to task completion, or overall performance was identified in the study between the precall and postcall groups. There was a trend toward improved speed at the expense of accuracy in the postcall group. Postcall score between the two trials improved, on average, by 3.3 (P = .045).
CONCLUSION: In the study of residents following current ACGME work-hour mandates, there was no diminution in performance before and after a 24-hour on-call period. There was a trend toward improved speed at the expense of accuracy. Furthermore, repetition on the ES3 in the postcall period can result in improved ES3 proficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15630383     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000150689.77764.ad

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Integrating simulation into a surgical residency program: is voluntary participation effective?

Authors:  L Chang; J Petros; D T Hess; C Rotondi; T J Babineau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Call-associated acute fatigue in surgical residents--subjective perception or objective fact? A cross-sectional observational study to examine the influence of fatigue on surgical performance.

Authors:  Katja Schlosser; Katja Maschuw; Eva Kupietz; Peter Weyers; Ralph Schneider; Matthias Rothmund; Iyad Hassan; Detlef Klaus Bartsch
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Overcoming the impact of physiologic tremors in ophthalmology.

Authors:  Gurfarmaan Singh; Wilson Wong Jun Jie; Michelle Tian Sun; Robert Casson; Dinesh Selva; WengOnn Chan
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Comparison of obstetric outcomes between on-call and patients' own obstetricians.

Authors:  Haim A Abenhaim; Alice Benjamin; Robert D Koby; Robert A Kinch; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Association Between Surgical Trainee Daytime Sleepiness and Intraoperative Technical Skill When Performing Septoplasty.

Authors:  Ya Wei Tseng; S Swaroop Vedula; Anand Malpani; Narges Ahmidi; Kofi D O Boahene; Ira D Papel; Theda C Kontis; Jessica Maxwell; John R Wanamaker; Patrick J Byrne; Sonya Malekzadeh; Gregory D Hager; Lisa E Ishii; Masaru Ishii
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

6.  Have restricted working hours reduced junior doctors' experience of fatigue? A focus group and telephone interview study.

Authors:  Gill Morrow; Bryan Burford; Madeline Carter; Jan Illing
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.