Literature DB >> 15629708

Direction selectivity of excitation and inhibition in simple cells of the cat primary visual cortex.

Nicholas J Priebe1, David Ferster.   

Abstract

Direction selectivity in simple cells of primary visual cortex, defined from their spike responses, cannot be predicted using linear models. It has been suggested that the shunting inhibition evoked by visual stimulation is responsible for the nonlinear component of direction selectivity. Cortical inhibition would suppress a neuron's firing when stimuli move in the nonpreferred direction, but would allow responses to stimuli in the preferred direction. Models of direction selectivity based solely on input from the lateral geniculate nucleus, however, propose that the nonlinear response is caused by spike threshold. By extracting excitatory and inhibitory components of synaptic inputs from intracellular records obtained in vivo, we demonstrate that excitation and inhibition are tuned for the same direction, but differ in relative timing. Further, membrane potential responses combine in a linear fashion. Spike threshold, however, quantitatively accounts for the nonlinear component of direction selectivity, amplifying the direction selectivity of spike output relative to that of synaptic inputs.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15629708     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  122 in total

1.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Inferring synaptic inputs given a noisy voltage trace via sequential Monte Carlo methods.

Authors:  Liam Paninski; Michael Vidne; Brian DePasquale; Daniel Gil Ferreira
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Estimating three synaptic conductances in a stochastic neural model.

Authors:  Stephen E Odom; Alla Borisyuk
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  Mechanisms of direction selectivity in cat primary visual cortex as revealed by visual adaptation.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Ilan Lampl; David Ferster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sharpening of directional selectivity from neural output of rabbit retina.

Authors:  Aurel Vasile Martiniuc; Günther Zeck; Wolfgang Stürzl; Alois Knoll
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Facilitatory mechanisms shape selectivity for the rate and direction of FM sweeps in the inferior colliculus of the pallid bat.

Authors:  Anthony J Williams; Zoltan M Fuzessery
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Discriminating among complex signals: the roles of inhibition for creating response selectivities.

Authors:  George D Pollak
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Broad inhibition sharpens orientation selectivity by expanding input dynamic range in mouse simple cells.

Authors:  Bao-hua Liu; Ya-tang Li; Wen-pei Ma; Chen-jie Pan; Li I Zhang; Huizhong Whit Tao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Glutamatergic inhibition in sensory neocortex.

Authors:  Charles C Lee; S Murray Sherman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.