Literature DB >> 15629219

Gender differences in memory processing: evidence from event-related potentials to faces.

François Guillem1, Melodee Mograss.   

Abstract

This study investigated gender differences on memory processing using event-related potentials (ERPs). Behavioral data and ERPs were recorded in 16 males and 10 females during a recognition memory task for faces. The behavioral data results showed that females performed better than males. Gender differences on ERPs were evidenced over anterior locations and involve the modulation of two spatially and temporally distinct components. These results are in general accordance with the view that males and females differ in the cognitive strategies they use to process information. Specifically, they could differ in their abilities to maintain information over interference and in the processing of the intrinsic contextual attributes of items, respectively, associated with the modulation of two anterior components. These interpretations lend support to the view that processing in females entails more detailed elaboration of information content than in males. Processing in males is more likely driven by schemas or overall information theme.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15629219     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  23 in total

1.  Gender differences in object location memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Voyer; Albert Postma; Brandy Brake; Julianne Imperato-McGinley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02

2.  Theta oscillations during the processing of monetary loss and gain: a perspective on gender and impulsivity.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Madhavi Rangaswamy; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Yongqiang Tang; Ashwini K Pandey; Bangalore N Roopesh; Arthur T Stimus; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Live interaction distinctively shapes social gaze dynamics in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Olga Dal Monte; Matthew Piva; Jason A Morris; Steve W C Chang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reward processing deficits and impulsivity in high-risk offspring of alcoholics: A study of event-related potentials during a monetary gambling task.

Authors:  Chella Kamarajan; Ashwini K Pandey; David B Chorlian; Niklas Manz; Arthur T Stimus; Lance O Bauer; Victor M Hesselbrock; Marc A Schuckit; Samuel Kuperman; John Kramer; Bernice Porjesz
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Task demand influences relationships among sex, clustering strategy, and recall: 16-word versus 9-word list learning tests.

Authors:  Preeti Sunderaraman; Helena M Blumen; David DeMatteo; Zoltan L Apa; Stephanie Cosentino
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.600

7.  Gender difference in the effect of daytime sleep on declarative memory for pictures.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Xiao-Lan Fu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.066

8.  Familiarity accentuates gaze cuing in women but not men.

Authors:  Robert O Deaner; Stephen V Shepherd; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  A framework combining delta Event-Related Oscillations (EROs) and Synchronisation Effects (ERD/ERS) to study emotional processing.

Authors:  Manousos A Klados; Christos Frantzidis; Ana B Vivas; Christos Papadelis; Chrysa Lithari; Costas Pappas; Panagiotis D Bamidis
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  Are females more responsive to emotional stimuli? A neurophysiological study across arousal and valence dimensions.

Authors:  C Lithari; C A Frantzidis; C Papadelis; Ana B Vivas; M A Klados; C Kourtidou-Papadeli; C Pappas; A A Ioannides; P D Bamidis
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.020

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.