BACKGROUND: Myocardial blush grade (MBG), corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), and ST-segment reduction are indices of myocardial reperfusion. HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated their predictive value for left ventricular (LV) function recovery by gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In 40 patients with AMI, gated SPECT was performed at admission and repeated 7 and 30 days after PCI. Left ventricular function recovery was defined as an increase > or = 10 points in SPECT LV ejection fraction from baseline to 1 month. The MBG, cTFC, and ST-segment elevation index 1 h after PCI were determined to evaluate reperfusion. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (Group 1) had LV function recovery and 16 (Group 2) did not. A significant correlation was found between LV function recovery and MBG (r = 0.66; p = 0.0001), and ST-segment elevation index at 1 h (r = -0.55; p = 0.0001), but not with cTFC. Univariate predictors of LV function recovery were MBG (p = 0.0003) and ST-segment elevation index 1 h after intervention (p = 0.0026), but not cTFC. In a multivariate analysis, MBG was the only predictor of LV function recovery. Myocardial blush grade > or = 2 and ST-segment elevation index reduction had the same accuracy (88%) for predicting LV function recovery. Lower accuracy (75%) was shown by fast cTFC (< 23 frames). Myocardial blush grade > or = 2 showed the better negative likelihood ratio, and ST-segment elevation index reduction had the higher positive likelihood ratio in predicting LV function recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial blush grade was the best parameter for prediction of LV function recovery: MBG > or = 2 and ST-segment elevation index reduction showed good accuracy in predicting LV function recovery. The cTFC failed to be a significant predictor.
BACKGROUND:Myocardial blush grade (MBG), corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), and ST-segment reduction are indices of myocardial reperfusion. HYPOTHESIS: We evaluated their predictive value for left ventricular (LV) function recovery by gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In 40 patients with AMI, gated SPECT was performed at admission and repeated 7 and 30 days after PCI. Left ventricular function recovery was defined as an increase > or = 10 points in SPECT LV ejection fraction from baseline to 1 month. The MBG, cTFC, and ST-segment elevation index 1 h after PCI were determined to evaluate reperfusion. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (Group 1) had LV function recovery and 16 (Group 2) did not. A significant correlation was found between LV function recovery and MBG (r = 0.66; p = 0.0001), and ST-segment elevation index at 1 h (r = -0.55; p = 0.0001), but not with cTFC. Univariate predictors of LV function recovery were MBG (p = 0.0003) and ST-segment elevation index 1 h after intervention (p = 0.0026), but not cTFC. In a multivariate analysis, MBG was the only predictor of LV function recovery. Myocardial blush grade > or = 2 and ST-segment elevation index reduction had the same accuracy (88%) for predicting LV function recovery. Lower accuracy (75%) was shown by fast cTFC (< 23 frames). Myocardial blush grade > or = 2 showed the better negative likelihood ratio, and ST-segment elevation index reduction had the higher positive likelihood ratio in predicting LV function recovery. CONCLUSIONS:Myocardial blush grade was the best parameter for prediction of LV function recovery: MBG > or = 2 and ST-segment elevation index reduction showed good accuracy in predicting LV function recovery. The cTFC failed to be a significant predictor.
Authors: A Schömig; A Kastrati; J Dirschinger; J Mehilli; U Schricke; J Pache; S Martinoff; F J Neumann; M Schwaiger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: H Ito; T Tomooka; N Sakai; H Yu; Y Higashino; K Fujii; T Masuyama; A Kitabatake; T Minamino Journal: Circulation Date: 1992-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Brad G Angeja; Madhavi Gunda; Sabina A Murphy; Burton E Sobel; Amy C Rundle; Mushabbar Syed; Abdelrahim Asfour; Steven Borzak; Steven G Gourlay; Hal V Barron; Raymond J Gibbons; C Michael Gibson Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: S Hamada; T Nishiue; S Nakamura; T Sugiura; H Kamihata; H Miyoshi; Y Imuro; T Iwasaka Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Philipp K Haager; Philipp Christott; Nicole Heussen; Wolfgang Lepper; Peter Hanrath; Rainer Hoffmann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-02-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Matthijs Bax; Robbert J de Winter; Carl E Schotborgh; Karel T Koch; Martijn Meuwissen; Michiel Voskuil; Rob Adams; Karla J J Mulder; Jan G P Tijssen; Jan J Piek Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-02-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jun Dong; Gjin Ndrepepa; Claus Schmitt; Julinda Mehilli; Sebastian Schmieder; Markus Schwaiger; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-06-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alban Dibra; Julinda Mehilli; Josef Dirschinger; Jürgen Pache; Jodi Neverve; Markus Schwaiger; Albert Schömig; Adnan Kastrati Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-03-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: JoEllyn M Abraham; C Michael Gibson; Gonzalo Pena; Ricardo Sanz; Amjad AlMahameed; Sabina A Murphy; Jesús Blanco; Juan Alonso-Briales; Juan Lopez-Mesa; Federico Gimeno; Pedro L Sánchez; Francisco Fernández-Avilés Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Felipe José de Andrade Falcão; Cláudia Maria Rodrigues Alves; Adriano Henrique Pereira Barbosa; Adriano Caixeta; José Marconi Almeida Sousa; José Augusto Marcondes Souza; Amaury Amaral; Luiz Carlos Wilke; Fátima Cristina A Perez; Iran Gonçalves Júnior; Edson Stefanini; Antônio Carlos Carvalho Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.365