Literature DB >> 15627185

Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses.

Ameer Jaff1, Vincent Molinié, François Mellot, Axel Guth, Thierry Lebret, Antoine Scherrer.   

Abstract

To evaluate the utility of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses, we conducted a prospective analysis of our imaging-guided procedures from January 1999 to February 2003. We performed 54 percutaneous core biopsies in 46 patients. Fluoro-computed tomography and ultrasound guidance were respectively used in 48 and six cases. One to four specimens were obtained by using an 18-gauge automated coaxial biopsy system. We reviewed the patients medical records, pathology results, and imaging studies. Core biopsy results were compared with surgical pathology (n=27) or clinical follow-up (n=19). All biopsies provided sufficient material for analysis. The mean tumor size was 33 mm. Biopsy findings were positive for malignancy in 31 cases; histologic diagnoses included renal cell carcinoma (n=23), transitional cell carcinoma (n=5), and metastasis (n=3). Biopsy revealed 15 benign diagnoses: oncocytoma (n=6), hemorrhagic renal cyst (n=3), chronic nephritis (n=3), angiomyolipoma (n=2), and mycotic renal abscess (n=1). The average follow-up period for patients with benign diagnoses was 16 months. Biopsy results showed normal renal parenchyma in eight of 54 procedures, all of which had recuperated by subsequent biopsies. No immediate complications occurred after the procedures. Imaging-guided percutaneous core biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the evaluation of renal masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15627185     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2577-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  Accuracy of diagnosis by guided biopsy of renal mass lesions classified indeterminate by imaging studies.

Authors:  C L Siegel
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  [Percutaneous renal biopsy with a semi-automate device].

Authors:  M Aimino; M Francisco; G Garnieri; P Chioso; M Ollino; M Comune; F Giacchino
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.720

3.  The impact of tumor size on clinical outcome in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  O Nativ; E Sabo; G Raviv; S Madjar; S Halachmi; B Moskovitz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Uzzo; A C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses: indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  B J Wood; M A Khan; F McGovern; M Harisinghani; P F Hahn; P R Mueller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 6.  The current role of percutaneous biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses.

Authors:  B R Herts; M E Baker
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  1995-11

7.  Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States.

Authors:  W H Chow; S S Devesa; J L Warren; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Increased incidence of serendipitously discovered renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Jayson; H Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  [Diagnosis of renal tumors with percutaneous biopsy].

Authors:  D Danis; M Pauer; I Slugen; M Hornák; P Hlavcák; K Furková; M Pavlovic
Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.278

10.  Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S A Fuhrman; L C Lasky; C Limas
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 6.394

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of imaging-guided fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses.

Authors:  Tony Geoghegan; Orla Buckley; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound of renal masses.

Authors:  Andre Ignee; Bernd Straub; Gudrun Schuessler; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

Review 3.  Ultrasonography findings for the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.

Authors:  Shengnan Zhao; Jiahong Shi; Ran Yang; Xiujuan Zhang; Wei Zhao; Zhixia Sun
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 1.314

4.  Approach to the small renal mass: weighing treatment options.

Authors:  Brian M Benway; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Diagnostic significance of biopsies in renal masses.

Authors:  Bayram Dogan; Serkan Altinova; Ahmet Tunc Ozdemir; Muhammed Fuat Ozcan; Erem Asil; Ziya Akbulut; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2014-12-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.