Literature DB >> 15626984

Effect of vertebral shell on injection pressure and intravertebral pressure in vertebroplasty.

Gamal Baroud1, Christianne Vant, Demetri Giannitsios, Marc Bohner, Thomas Steffen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: An experimental biomechanical study conducted on osteoporotic cadaveric vertebrae.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To measure the intravertebral shell pressure and injection pressure; and 2) to determine the effect of the vertebral shell on the intravertebral shell pressure and on the injection pressure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Forces that govern cement flow are an essential component of the cement injection process in vertebroplasty. The vertebral shell may play a significant role in confining the flow of cement in the vertebral body and thereby affecting the intravertebral pressure and injection pressure.
METHODS: A small fenestration was created in the left lateral vertebral shell of 14 vertebrae. A valve to open and close the fenestration and a sensor to measure the intravertebral pressure were attached to the opening. A closed fenestration simulated an intact shell, whereas an open fenestration represented a vented shell. Injection pressure and intravertebral pressure at the shell were recorded during a controlled injection.
RESULTS: A closed fenestration resulted in a significant increase in the intravertebral pressure at the shell. During the injection, the shell pressure increased on average to approximately 3.54 +/- 2.91 kPa. Conversely, an open fenestration resulted in an instant relaxation of the shell pressure to the ambient pressure of 0 kPa. Additionally, the injection pressure was approximately 97 times higher than the shell pressure.
CONCLUSION: The presence of vertebral shell seems to be important for intravertebral pressure. However, the intravertebral shell pressure adds very little to the injection pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15626984     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000149188.51154.5b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Vertebroplasty: an update: value of percutaneous cement augmentation after randomized, placebo-controlled trials].

Authors:  P F Heini
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  A new cannula to ease cement injection during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  G Baroud; T Steffen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty: how good is the evidence?

Authors:  Fergus E McKiernan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  The effect of pulsed jet lavage in vertebroplasty on injection forces of PMMA bone cement: an animal study.

Authors:  Andreas Boger; Lorin M Benneker; Jörg Krebs; Vanessa Boner; Paul F Heini; Armando Gisep
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Intravertebral pressure gradient during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Markus Weisskopf; Oliver Miltner; Uwe Maus; Sascha Gravius; Jörg Axel Karl Ohnsorge
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Functional outcomes of kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic and osteolytic vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  A J Khanna; M K Reinhardt; D Togawa; I H Lieberman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Cement leakage and filling pattern study of low viscous vertebroplastic versus high viscous confidence cement.

Authors:  Mohamed Habib; Hassan Serhan; Connie Marchek; Gamal Baroud
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2010-03-01

Review 8.  A Review of PMMA Bone Cement and Intra-Cardiac Embolism.

Authors:  Puneeth Shridhar; Yanfei Chen; Ramzi Khalil; Anton Plakseychuk; Sung Kwon Cho; Bryan Tillman; Prashant N Kumta; YoungJae Chun
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Functional Properties of Low-Modulus PMMA Bone Cements Containing Linoleic Acid.

Authors:  Céline Robo; David Wenner; S J Kumari A Ubhayasekera; Jöns Hilborn; Caroline Öhman-Mägi; Cecilia Persson
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-01-17
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.