Literature DB >> 1562472

Chemical and immunological testing for faecel occult blood: a comparison of two tests in symptomatic patients.

W M Thomas1, J D Hardcastle, J Jackson, G Pye.   

Abstract

An established chemical faecal occult blood test (Haemoccult prepared without rehydration) has been compared with a new immunological test (Hemeselect) in patients referred for investigation of lower gastro-intestinal symptoms. Hemeselect was shown to have a higher sensitivity for colorectal carcinoma (94.0% compared with 58.0%), the greatest difference in sensitivity between the two tests being for rectal cancers. Similarly Hemeselect was more sensitive than Haemoccult for colorectal adenomas (66.6% vs 33.3%), and for inflammatory bowel disease (88.9% vs 33.3%). However the enhanced sensitivity of Hemeselect for colorectal neoplasia and inflammatory bowel disease was accompanied by a significant increase in the overall rate of positive reactions (32.8% of patients had a positive Hemeselect reaction compared with 14.8% who had a positive Haemoccult test), and a reduction in specificity (84.1% for Hemeselect vs 96.0% for Haemoccult). Hemeselect is a more sensitive indicator of colorectal neoplasia in symptomatic subjects, trials of its use as a screening test for asymptomatic neoplasia appear justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1562472      PMCID: PMC1977559          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1992.125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of occult blood tests over a six-day period.

Authors:  P A Farrands; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Clin Oncol       Date:  1983-09

2.  Role of dietary restriction in Haemoccult screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  W M Thomas; G Pye; J D Hardcastle; J Chamberlain; R M Charnley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Randomised, controlled trial of faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer. Results for first 107,349 subjects.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; W M Thomas; J Chamberlain; G Pye; J Sheffield; P D James; T W Balfour; S S Amar; N C Armitage; S M Moss
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictivity of the Hemoccult test in screening for colorectal cancers. The University of Minnesota's Colon Cancer Control Study.

Authors:  J S Mandel; J H Bond; M Bradley; D C Snover; T R Church; S Williams; G Watt; L M Schuman; F Ederer; V Gilbertsen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Screening and rescreening for colorectal cancer. A controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing in 27,700 subjects.

Authors:  J Kewenter; S Björk; E Haglind; L Smith; J Svanvik; C Ahrén
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test. A prospective randomized study at Funen, Denmark.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; J Olsen; K Bech; O Søndergaard
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Five guaiac-based tests for occult blood in faeces compared in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  H Adlercreutz; P Partanen; P Virkola; K Liewendahl; M J Turunen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.713

8.  The clinical value of Haemoccult and Fecatwin in the detection of colorectal neoplasia in hospital and general practice patients.

Authors:  I G Barrison; R A Parkins
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Accuracy and value of the Hemoccult test in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  R J Leicester; A Lightfoot; J Millar; D G Colin-Jones; R H Hunt
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-02-26
  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Effect of verification bias on the sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan S Rosman; Mark A Korsten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 8.

Authors:  W S A Smellie; K K Hampton; R Bowley; R Bowlees; S C Martin; N Shaw; J Hoffman; J P Ng; S M Mackenzie; C van Heyningen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Chemical and immunological testing for faecal occult blood in screening subjects at risk of familial colorectal cancer.

Authors:  L M Hunt; P S Rooney; K Bostock; M H Robinson; J D Hardcastle; N C Armitage
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Value of symptoms and additional diagnostic tests for colorectal cancer in primary care: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Petra Jellema; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; David J Bruinvels; Christian D Mallen; Stijn J B van Weyenberg; Chris J Mulder; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-31

Review 5.  Diagnostic Accuracy Of Fecal Occult Blood Tests For Detecting Proximal Versus Distal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ming Lu; Xiaohu Luo; Ni Li; Hongda Chen; Min Dai
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.