Literature DB >> 15624306

Analysis of the mortality experience amongst U.S. nuclear power industry workers after chronic low-dose exposure to ionizing radiation.

Geoffrey R Howe1, Lydia B Zablotska, Jack J Fix, John Egel, Jeff Buchanan.   

Abstract

Workers employed in 15 utilities that generate nuclear power in the United States have been followed for up to 18 years between 1979 and 1997. Their cumulative dose from whole body ionizing radiation has been determined from the dose records maintained by the facilities themselves and the REIRS and REMS systems maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Department of Energy, respectively. Mortality in the cohort from a number of causes has been analyzed with respect to individual radiation doses. The cohort displays a very substantial healthy worker effect, i.e. considerably lower cancer and noncancer mortality than the general population. Based on 26 and 368 deaths, respectively, positive though statistically nonsignificant associations were seen for mortality from leukemia (excluding chronic lymphocytic leukemia) and all solid cancers combined, with excess relative risks per sievert of 5.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.56, 30.4] and 0.506 (95% CI -2.01, 4.64), respectively. These estimates are very similar to those from the atomic bomb survivors study, though the wide confidence intervals are also consistent with lower or higher risk estimates. A strong positive and statistically significant association between radiation dose and deaths from arteriosclerotic heart disease including coronary heart disease was also observed in the cohort, with an ERR of 8.78 (95% CI 2.10, 20.0). While associations with heart disease have been reported in some other occupational studies, the magnitude of the present association is not consistent with them and therefore needs cautious interpretation and merits further attention. At present, the relatively small number of deaths and the young age of the cohort (mean age at end of follow-up is 45 years) limit the power of the study, but further follow-up and the inclusion of the present data in an ongoing IARC combined analysis of nuclear workers from 15 countries will have greater power for testing the main hypotheses of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15624306     DOI: 10.1667/rr3258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  32 in total

1.  Fluoroscopy X-Ray Organ-Specific Dosimetry System (FLUXOR) for Estimation of Organ Doses and Their Uncertainties in the Canadian Fluoroscopy Cohort Study.

Authors:  A Iulian Apostoaei; Brian A Thomas; F Owen Hoffman; David C Kocher; Kathleen M Thiessen; David Borrego; Choonsik Lee; Steven L Simon; Lydia B Zablotska
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Radiation dose-rate effects, endogenous DNA damage, and signaling resonance.

Authors:  Michael M Vilenchik; Alfred G Knudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Trimming exposure data, putting radiation workers at risk: improving disclosure and consent through a national radiation dose-registry.

Authors:  Kristin Shrader-Frechette
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Very large amounts of radiation are required to produce cancer.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; T Edmond Hui; Lezlie A Couch
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Low-dose radiation exposure and atherosclerosis in ApoE⁻/⁻ mice.

Authors:  R E J Mitchel; M Hasu; M Bugden; H Wyatt; M P Little; A Gola; G Hildebrandt; N D Priest; S C Whitman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Review and meta-analysis of epidemiological associations between low/moderate doses of ionizing radiation and circulatory disease risks, and their possible mechanisms.

Authors:  M P Little; E J Tawn; I Tzoulaki; R Wakeford; G Hildebrandt; F Paris; S Tapio; P Elliott
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Radiation exposure and cancer incidence in a cohort of nuclear power industry workers in the Republic of Korea, 1992-2005.

Authors:  Meeseon Jeong; Young-Woo Jin; Kwang Hee Yang; Yoon-Ok Ahn; Chang-Yong Cha
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  A model of cardiovascular disease giving a plausible mechanism for the effect of fractionated low-dose ionizing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Anna Gola; Ioanna Tzoulaki
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Radiation exposure and circulatory disease risk: Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb survivor data, 1950-2003.

Authors:  Yukiko Shimizu; Kazunori Kodama; Nobuo Nishi; Fumiyoshi Kasagi; Akihiko Suyama; Midori Soda; Eric J Grant; Hiromi Sugiyama; Ritsu Sakata; Hiroko Moriwaki; Mikiko Hayashi; Manami Konda; Roy E Shore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.