Literature DB >> 1562402

Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.

M Kehler1, U Albrechtsson, E Arnadóttir, A Ebbesen, P Hochbergs, A Lundin, K Lyttkens, K Kheddache, L G Månsson, J E Angelhed.   

Abstract

Ninety-eight digital radiographs of a chest phantom with simulated tumors in the mediastinum and left lung and a pneumothorax-simulation in the right hemithorax were compared with the corresponding examinations saved on optical disk and viewed on a 1,000-line monitor. The examinations were reviewed by 7 radiologists with different experience, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. There was no significant difference between the hard-copy and the monitor results. A significant interobserver difference was seen only with the low attenuating 6 mm "tumor" and then only between the observer with the highest and the one with the lowest scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1562402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  2 in total

1.  Low-cost soft-copy display accuracy in the detection of pulmonary nodules by single-exposure dual-energy subtraction: comparison with hard-copy viewing.

Authors:  S Kido; K Kuriyama; N Hosomi; E Inoue; C Kuroda; T Horai
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Should 3K zoom function be used for detection of pneumothorax in cesium iodide/amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiographs presented on 1K-matrix soft copies?

Authors:  Karin A Herrmann; H M Bonél; A Stäbler; M Voelk; M Strotzer; C J Zech; M F Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.