Literature DB >> 15622596

Perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence: preliminary report.

Tetsuo Yamana1, Tomoko Takahashi, Junichi Iwadare.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the safety efficacy, and impact on quality of life of the perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence.
METHODS: Since August 2001, we performed the perineal puborectalis sling operation on eight patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. A specially designed polyester mesh sling was introduced along the puborectalis muscle, from a posterior perianal incision, running to a small suprapubic incision. The ends were tied together with moderate tension. Patients were evaluated with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, the Cleveland Clinic Score of Incontinence, and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. Manometry and defecography were performed before and six months after the operation.
RESULTS: Eight patients (7 females; mean age, 63 (range, 44-77) years) were evaluated. A wound infection developed in one patient, which subsided with antibiotics. A rectal ulcer developed in one patient, necessitating sling removal. In the remaining seven patients, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index improved from 27 to 9, and the Cleveland Clinic Score of Incontinence improved from 13 to 5 (P < 0.05). All parameters in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved: lifestyle from 2.1 to 3.6; coping/behavior from 1.5 to 3.4; depression/self perception from 2.3 to 3.7; and embarrassment from 2 to 3.6 (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure. However, the median anorectal angle on defecography after the operation was significantly reduced (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the perineal puborectalis sling operation is technically feasible, with low morbidity, and can be an effective procedure for idiopathic fecal incontinence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15622596     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0675-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence: an up-to-date critical overview of surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Christophe Müller; Orlin Belyaev; Thomas Deska; Ansgar Chromik; Dirk Weyhe; Waldemar Uhl
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Technique of the transobturator puborectal sling in fecal incontinence.

Authors:  C Brochard; M Queralto; P Cabarrot; L Siproudhis; G Portier
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bochenska; Anne-Marie Boller
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

Review 4.  Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Andreas M Kaiser; Guy R Orangio; Massarat Zutshi; Suraj Alva; Tracy L Hull; Peter W Marcello; David A Margolin; Janice F Rafferty; W Donald Buie; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Levator ani and puborectalis muscle rupture: diagnosis and repair for perineal instability.

Authors:  M S Gh Alketbi; J Meyer; J Robert-Yap; R Scarpa; E Gialamas; Z Abbassi; A Balaphas; N Buchs; B Roche; F Ris
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Recent advances in managing fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Giovanna Da Silva; Anne Sirany
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-07-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.