OBJECTIVE: To assess the axillary recurrence rate in breast cancer patients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) or SLN micrometastases (>0.2 mm to <or=2.0 mm) after breast surgery and SLN procedure without formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Under controlled study conditions, the SLN procedure proved to be a reliable method for the evaluation of the axillary nodal status in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Axillary dissection of levels I and II can thus be omitted if the SLN is free of macrometastases. The prognostic value and potential therapeutic consequences of SLN micrometastases, however, remain a matter of great debate. We present the follow-up data of our prospective SLN study, particularly focusing on the axillary recurrence rate in patients with negative SLN and SLN micrometastases. METHODS: In this prospective study, 236 SLN procedures were performed in 234 patients with early-stage breast cancer between April 1998 and September 2002. The SLN were marked and identified with 99m technetium-labeled colloid and blue dye (Isosulfanblue 1%). The excised SLNs were examined by step sectioning and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry (cytokeratin antibodies Lu-5 or CK 22). Only patients with SLN macrometastases received formal ALND of levels I and II, while patients with negative SLN or SLN micrometastases did not undergo further axillary surgery. RESULTS: The SLN identification rate was 95% (224/236). SLN macrometastases were found in 33% (74/224) and micrometastases (>0.2 mm to <or=2 mm) in 12% (27/224) of patients. Adjuvant therapy did not differ between the group of SLN-negative patients and those with SLN micrometastases. After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 12-64 months), 99% (222/224) of evaluable patients were reassessed. While 1 patient with a negative SLN developed axillary recurrence (0.7%, 1/122), all 27 patients with SLN micrometastases were disease-free at the last follow-up control. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary recurrences in patients with negative SLN or SLN micrometastases did not occur more frequently after SLN biopsy alone compared with results from the recent literature regarding breast cancer patients undergoing formal ALND. Based on a median follow-up of 42 months-one of the longest so far in the literature-the present investigation does not provide evidence that the presence of SLN micrometastases leads to axillary recurrence or distant disease and supports the theory that formal ALND may be omitted in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the axillary recurrence rate in breast cancerpatients with negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) or SLN micrometastases (>0.2 mm to <or=2.0 mm) after breast surgery and SLN procedure without formal axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Under controlled study conditions, the SLN procedure proved to be a reliable method for the evaluation of the axillary nodal status in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer. Axillary dissection of levels I and II can thus be omitted if the SLN is free of macrometastases. The prognostic value and potential therapeutic consequences of SLN micrometastases, however, remain a matter of great debate. We present the follow-up data of our prospective SLN study, particularly focusing on the axillary recurrence rate in patients with negative SLN and SLN micrometastases. METHODS: In this prospective study, 236 SLN procedures were performed in 234 patients with early-stage breast cancer between April 1998 and September 2002. The SLN were marked and identified with 99m technetium-labeled colloid and blue dye (Isosulfanblue 1%). The excised SLNs were examined by step sectioning and stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunohistochemistry (cytokeratin antibodies Lu-5 or CK 22). Only patients with SLN macrometastases received formal ALND of levels I and II, while patients with negative SLN or SLN micrometastases did not undergo further axillary surgery. RESULTS: The SLN identification rate was 95% (224/236). SLN macrometastases were found in 33% (74/224) and micrometastases (>0.2 mm to <or=2 mm) in 12% (27/224) of patients. Adjuvant therapy did not differ between the group of SLN-negative patients and those with SLN micrometastases. After a median follow-up of 42 months (range 12-64 months), 99% (222/224) of evaluable patients were reassessed. While 1 patient with a negative SLN developed axillary recurrence (0.7%, 1/122), all 27 patients with SLN micrometastases were disease-free at the last follow-up control. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary recurrences in patients with negative SLN or SLN micrometastases did not occur more frequently after SLN biopsy alone compared with results from the recent literature regarding breast cancerpatients undergoing formal ALND. Based on a median follow-up of 42 months-one of the longest so far in the literature-the present investigation does not provide evidence that the presence of SLN micrometastases leads to axillary recurrence or distant disease and supports the theory that formal ALND may be omitted in these patients.
Authors: Jerri S Fant; Michael D Grant; Sally M Knox; Sheryl A Livingston; Kimberly Ridl; Ronald C Jones; Joseph A Kuhn Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: A Haid; T Kuehn; P Konstantiniuk; R Köberle-Wührer; M Knauer; R Kreienberg; G Zimmermann Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Karen K Swenson; Mary J Nissen; Carolyn Ceronsky; Lindsey Swenson; Martin W Lee; Todd M Tuttle Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Brian D Badgwell; Stephen P Povoski; Shahab F Abdessalam; Donn C Young; William B Farrar; Michael J Walker; Lisa D Yee; Emmanuel E Zervos; William E Carson; William E Burak Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: J Michael Guenther; Nora M Hansen; L Andrew DiFronzo; Armando E Giuliano; J Craig Collins; Baiba L Grube; Theodore X O'Connell Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2003-01
Authors: Holm Eggemann; Atanas Ignatov; Madeleine Hetterich; Michael Gerken; Olaf Ortmann; Elisabeth C Inwald; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Igor Langer; Ulrich Guller; Carsten T Viehl; Holger Moch; Edward Wight; Felix Harder; Daniel Oertli; Markus Zuber Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2010-08-07
Authors: Johannes Bargehr; Michael Edlinger; Michael Hubalek; Christian Marth; Roland Reitsamer Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Marieke E Straver; Philip Meijnen; Geertjan van Tienhoven; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Robert E Mansel; Jan Bogaerts; Nicole Duez; Luigi Cataliotti; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Helen A Westenberg; Huub van der Mijle; Marko Snoj; Coen Hurkmans; Emiel J T Rutgers Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jacqueline S Jeruss; Lisa A Newman; Gregory D Ayers; Massimo Cristofanilli; Kristine R Broglio; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Min Yi; Jennifer F Waljee; Merrick I Ross; Kelly K Hunt Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860