Literature DB >> 15621177

Retinal stretching limits peripheral visual acuity in myopia.

Toco Y P Chui1, Maurice K H Yap, Henry H L Chan, Larry N Thibos.   

Abstract

Axial elongation of the myopic eye has the potential to stretch the retina, thereby reducing the sampling density of retinal neurons. Resolution acuity in the peripheral field of normal eyes is known to be sampling-limited, which suggests that retinal stretching in the myopic eye should have a direct effect on resolution acuity everywhere in the visual field except perhaps the fovea, which is usually optically limited. We tested this prediction that neural sampling density is reduced in myopic eyes by measuring resolution acuity for sinusoidal gratings in the fovea plus five peripheral locations in 60 myopic subjects exhibiting a wide range of refractive errors. Control experiments using a detection paradigm to provoke spatial aliasing verified that peripheral resolution was sampling limited. Retinal spatial frequencies of the grating stimulus were computed assuming Knapps' Law of visual optics, which ensures that retinal image size (in mm) is independent of refractive error when axial myopia is corrected by a spectacle lens located in the anterior focal plane of the eye. Results obtained at every retinal locus showed that resolution acuity declined linearly with magnitude of refractive error. Regression of the population data indicated that approximately 15 D of refractive error doubles the spacing between retinal neurons, thereby halving peripheral resolution acuity relative to the emmetropic eye. Several subjects also demonstrated sampling-limited performance in the fovea, which indicated that optical filtering by the eye's optical system failed to protect the fovea from aliasing artifacts of neural undersampling in these eyes. We conclude that stretching of the retina is a primary cause of reduced spatial resolution of the peripheral field, and occasionally of the fovea, in myopic eyes. Stretching appears to be locally uniform over the central +/-15 degrees of visual field but is globally non-uniform since the foveal region appears to stretch more than the globe itself.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621177     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  25 in total

1.  Retinal cell imaging in myopic chickens using adaptive optics multiphoton microscopy.

Authors:  Juan M Bueno; Raquel Palacios; Anastasia Giakoumaki; Emilio J Gualda; Frank Schaeffel; Pablo Artal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Retinal image quality during accommodation in adult myopic eyes.

Authors:  Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; Emily Aslakson; Andrew Kornaus; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Is an objective refraction optimised using the visual Strehl ratio better than a subjective refraction?

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Lan Chi Nguyen; Han Cheng; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  In vivo measurements of cone photoreceptor spacing in myopic eyes from images obtained by an adaptive optics fundus camera.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Kitaguchi; Kenichiro Bessho; Tatsuo Yamaguchi; Naoki Nakazawa; Toshifumi Mihashi; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Electrophysiological study of myopia.

Authors:  Mona Abdel Kader
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-08-16

6.  Accommodation and induced myopia in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Nicole Quinn; Kayla Baker
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Vitreo-retinal traction and anastrozole use.

Authors:  Alvin Eisner; Emily J Thielman; Julie Falardeau; John T Vetto
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Mutations in SCO2 are associated with autosomal-dominant high-grade myopia.

Authors:  Khanh-Nhat Tran-Viet; Caldwell Powell; Veluchamy A Barathi; Thomas Klemm; Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Vachiranee Limviphuvadh; Vincent Soler; Candice Ho; Tammy Yanovitch; Georg Schneider; Yi-Ju Li; Erica Nading; Ravikanth Metlapally; Seang-Mei Saw; Liang Goh; Steve Rozen; Terri L Young
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Defective Temporal Window of the Foveal Visual Processing in High Myopia.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Xiaoxiao Ying; Xianghang He; Jia Qu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.