Literature DB >> 15620775

Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest--comparison of the anterior and posterior sites.

P Kessler1, M Thorwarth, A Bloch-Birkholz, E Nkenke, F W Neukam.   

Abstract

In 1998 we harvested a total of 127 bone grafts from the iliac crest of 65 male and 53 female patients aged 8-80 years. We measured the quantity of bone obtained, the operating time and the donor site morbidity of the anterior approach (n=81) compared with the posterior approach (n=46). The mean volume of bone harvested was 15 cm(3) (range: 9-25.5) of monocorticocancellous- or bicortico-cancellous bone chips or those from a trephine bur. The mean operating time for the anterior approach was 35 min (range: 22-48), for the posterior approach 40 min (range: 32-55). There were 15 complications, which were limited to those in whom the volume of bone exceeded 17 cm(3). The posterior approach caused less morbidity, notably in the form of significantly less pain and irregularity of gait. The patient has, however, to be repositioned during operation, which added to its total duration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15620775     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  24 in total

1.  Characterization of cortico-cancellous bone along the iliac crest: focus on graft harvesting.

Authors:  Niladri Kumar Mahato
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Femoral marrow cavity bone harvesting used for arthroscopic refilling of misplaced or enlarged bone tunnels in revision ACL surgery: an arthroscopically supported technique with antegrade intramedullary bone harvesting by a reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system.

Authors:  S Grote; T Helfen; F Mück; M Regauer; W C Prall
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  [Bone harvesting from the iliac crest].

Authors:  M Jäger; B Westhoff; A Wild; R Krauspe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

Review 5.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Bone graft harvesting using the RIA (reaming irrigation aspirator) system - a quantitative assessment.

Authors:  Florian M Kovar; Gerald E Wozasek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Enhanced differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on extracellular matrix-containing osteomimetic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Katy Rutledge; Qingsu Cheng; Marina Pryzhkova; Greg M Harris; Ehsan Jabbarzadeh
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.056

8.  The efficacy of porous hydroxyapatite bone chip as an extender of local bone graft in posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Hyoungmin Kim; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-Sup Yeom; Jae-Hyup Lee; Ki-Ho Lee; Bong-Soon Chang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone harvesting for cervical fusion: a comparison between minimally invasive and open techniques.

Authors:  Raymond Pollock; Ilhan Alcelik; Chandra Bhatia; Graham Chuter; Kiran Lingutla; Chakravarty Budithi; Manoj Krishna
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A novel biomimetic polymer scaffold design enhances bone ingrowth.

Authors:  Chris P Geffre; David S Margolis; John T Ruth; Donald W DeYoung; Brandi C Tellis; John A Szivek
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.