Literature DB >> 15620562

Tiered pricing of vaccines: a win-win-win situation, not a subsidy.

Jens Plahte1.   

Abstract

It is a widespread misconception that tiered pricing of vaccines entails the producers or consumers in the high-price markets subsidising the consumers in the low-price markets. Such a view is inconsistent with realities, as well as with economic theory. In the vaccine sector, the cost and demand structures ensure that all three parties involved benefit. The developing countries' low-price market consumers get access to a product that would have been unattainable if the vaccines were offered at a uniform price. The producers benefit from increased revenues and profits, and the developed countries' high-price market consumers benefit from slightly lower prices than would be the case in the absence of the low-price market. This article rebuts the notion that tiered pricing of vaccines is a subsidy, and discusses past experiences, present challenges, and future opportunities for tiered pricing of vaccines in relation to developing countries' immunisation programmes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15620562     DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(04)01255-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis        ISSN: 1473-3099            Impact factor:   25.071


  10 in total

1.  Advance market commitment for pneumococcal vaccines: putting theory into practice.

Authors:  Tania Cernuschi; Eliane Furrer; Nina Schwalbe; Andrew Jones; Ernst R Berndt; Susan McAdams
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Enhancing the work of the Department of Health and Human Services national vaccine program in global immunization: recommendations of the National Vaccine Advisory Committee: approved by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee on September 12, 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Challenges for nationwide vaccine delivery in African countries.

Authors:  Mario Songane
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-10-19

4.  Public support in the United States for global equity in vaccine pricing.

Authors:  Yee Chan; Gaurav Datt; Asadul Islam; Birendra Rai; Liang C Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  A win-win solution?: A critical analysis of tiered pricing to improve access to medicines in developing countries.

Authors:  Suerie Moon; Elodie Jambert; Michelle Childs; Tido von Schoen-Angerer
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.185

6.  An opportunity to incentivize innovation to increase vaccine safety in the United States by improving vaccine delivery using vaccine patches.

Authors:  Kimberly M Thompson; Walter A Orenstein; Alan R Hinman
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Public-private knowledge transfer and access to medicines: a systematic review and qualitative study of perceptions and roles of scientists involved in HPV vaccine research.

Authors:  Rosa Jahn; Olaf Müller; Stefan Nöst; Kayvan Bozorgmehr
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.185

Review 8.  Are good intentions putting the vaccination ecosystem at risk?

Authors:  Michael Watson; Eliot Faron de Goër
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Funding of drugs: do vaccines warrant a different approach?

Authors:  Philippe Beutels; Paul A Scuffham; C Raina MacIntyre
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 25.071

Review 10.  Sustainable vaccine development: a vaccine manufacturer's perspective.

Authors:  Rino Rappuoli; Emmanuel Hanon
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.486

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.