Literature DB >> 15619209

Atypia in inverted urothelial papillomas: pathology and prognostic significance.

Jennifer N Broussard1, Puay Hoon Tan, Jonathan I Epstein.   

Abstract

Inverted papillomas of the bladder are considered benign urothelial neoplasms, based on their histology and clinical course. There are scant data on inverted papillomas with atypical features. Whether to designate them as inverted papillomas with atypia or low-grade transitional cell carcinomas with inverted features is controversial. In the present study, 11 cases of inverted papillomas with atypia and 10 controls of classic inverted papillomas without atypia were collected from 2 institutions. The inverted papillomas with atypia had the typical architectural features of inverted papillomas consisting of thin anastomosing trabeculae of urothelium growing downward into the stroma without an exophytic papillary component. The atypical areas in the current series were focal, with other areas exhibiting the benign cytology of classic inverted papillomas. Cases with atypia were subdivided into the following groups: (1) 5 cases notable for areas containing prominent nucleoli, (2) 2 cases with foci with atypical squamous features, (3) 2 cases with areas of dysplasia, approaching the level of carcinoma in situ, (4) 1 case with degenerative-appearing multinucleated giant cells, and (5) 1 case notable for nests of atypical squamous cells associated with large, atypical squamoid cells with a pagetoid appearance in addition to degenerative-appearing multinucleated giant cells. Ki67 was slightly increased in 1 case, with focal dysplasia approaching carcinoma in situ and in 1 case with prominent nucleoli (increased Ki67 in both the atypical and non-atypical areas) and in the case with atypical squamous, pagetoid, and giant cells (no increased Ki67 in the atypical components). Two of the atypical inverted papilloma cases with prominent nucleoli demonstrated an increase in p53 staining throughout the lesions. Cytokeratin (CK) 20 staining was negative in all cases of inverted papillomas. No significant increase in Ki67 staining was found in any of the 10 control cases; increased p53 staining was seen in 1 control case. CK20 staining was negative in the 10 control cases. In the 11 cases with atypia, clinical follow-up revealed no history of prior or subsequent bladder neoplasms. In the cases reviewed, most inverted papillomas with atypia did not demonstrate significantly increased cellular proliferation in comparison with inverted papillomas without atypical features. To date, there has been no association with urothelial carcinoma in the individuals diagnosed with atypical inverted papillomas. These findings suggest that these lesions are currently best classified as inverted papillomas with atypia, not as low-grade transitional carcinomas, and that they merit continued evaluation as a distinct group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15619209     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  8 in total

Review 1.  Inverted urothelial papilloma: A review of diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management.

Authors:  Mary K Sweeney; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Jennifer Gordetsky
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Upper urinary tract inverted papillomas: Report of 10 cases.

Authors:  Jin-Dan Luo; Ping Wang; Jun Chen; Ben Liu; Shuo Wang; Bo-Hua Shen; Li-Ping Xie
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Inverted papilloma of the ureter: study of a rare case with emphasis on clinicopathologic implications.

Authors:  Nikolaos Mertziotis; Diomidis Kozyrakis; Andreas Petrolekas; Maria Terzi; Nikiforos Kapranos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  The pathology of urinary bladder lesions with an inverted growth pattern.

Authors:  Aitao Guo; Aijun Liu; Xiaodong Teng
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Can Inform the Differential Diagnosis of Low-Grade Noninvasive Urothelial Carcinoma with an Inverted Growth Pattern and Inverted Urothelial Papilloma.

Authors:  Juan-Juan Sun; Yong Wu; Yong-Ming Lu; Hui-Zhi Zhang; Tao Wang; Xiao-Qun Yang; Meng-Hong Sun; Chao-Fu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Inverted urothelial papilloma of the upper urinary tract: description of two cases with systematic literature review.

Authors:  R Santi; I C Galli; V Canzonieri; J I Lopez; G Nesi
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Proteomic-Based Machine Learning Analysis Reveals PYGB as a Novel Immunohistochemical Biomarker to Distinguish Inverted Urothelial Papilloma From Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma With Inverted Growth.

Authors:  Minsun Jung; Cheol Lee; Dohyun Han; Kwangsoo Kim; Sunah Yang; Ilias P Nikas; Kyung Chul Moon; Hyeyoon Kim; Min Ji Song; Bohyun Kim; Hyebin Lee; Han Suk Ryu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Diagnostic algorithm for papillary urothelial tumors in the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Jung-Weon Shim; Kang Su Cho; Young-Deuk Choi; Yong-Wook Park; Dong-Wha Lee; Woon-Sup Han; Sang-In Shim; Hyun-Jung Kim; Nam Hoon Cho
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 4.064

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.