Literature DB >> 28443149

Inverted urothelial papilloma: A review of diagnostic pitfalls and clinical management.

Mary K Sweeney1, Soroush Rais-Bahrami2,3, Jennifer Gordetsky3,4.   

Abstract

Inverted urothelial papilloma (IUP) is a rare, non-invasive endophytic lesion that accounts for 1-2% of urothelial tumours. On cystoscopy, IUP appears as a pedunculated/papillary mass with a smooth surface. On microscopy, IUP has an endophytic growth pattern with the bulk of the tumour covered by a superficial layer of urothelium, which can be hyperplastic or attenuated. The cytology should be bland, with uniform, spindled cells arranged in anastomosing trabeculae and cords with peripheral palisading of basaloid cells. Exophytic papillae and mitotic activity should be absent or focal. Pseudoglandular spaces and squamous metaplasia may also be present. There are distinct molecular differences between IUP and urothelial carcinoma (UC). IUP rarely has mutations of FGFR3, homozygous loss of 9p21, or gain of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17, whereas these mutations are frequently seen in UC. In addition, IUP is much less likely to have TERT mutations compared to UC. Immunohistochemistry can also be helpful in distinguishing the two entities as IUP is typically negative for CK20 and has a low Ki-67 proliferation index. Positivity for p53 may be seen in a minority of IUP. IUP can recur and be seen in association with UC. Distinguishing IUP from UC can be difficult due to the similarity between the two entities both on cystoscopy and histology, as up to 25% of UCs will also have inverted growth. Given the morphologic variants of IUP and UC, it is possible for a diagnostic error to occur, which can significantly impact patient management.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28443149      PMCID: PMC5403683          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.4136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  30 in total

1.  Inverted urothelial papillomas with foamy or vacuolated cytoplasm.

Authors:  Samson W Fine; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 2.  Inverted papilloma of the urinary tract.

Authors:  Alexandra L Brown; Ronald J Cohen
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  The prognostic value of a primary inverted papilloma of the urinary tract.

Authors:  J A Witjes; M R van Balken; C A van de Kaa
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Inverted urothelial papilloma: is ploidy, MIB-1 proliferative activity, or p53 protein accumulation predictive of urothelial carcinoma?

Authors:  J C Cheville; K Wu; T J Sebo; L Cheng; D Riehle; C M Lohse; V Shane
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Upper urinary tract inverted papillomas.

Authors:  A N Chiura; A Wirtschafter; D H Bagley
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Inverted urinary papilloma: report of five cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  D W Henderson; P W Allen; A J Bourne
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol       Date:  1975

7.  Human papillomavirus is not an etiologic agent of urothelial inverted papillomas.

Authors:  Riley E Alexander; Darrell D Davidson; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Rodolfo Montironi; Gregory T MacLennan; Eva Compérat; Muhammad T Idrees; Robert E Emerson; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Urothelial carcinoma with an inverted growth pattern can be distinguished from inverted papilloma by fluorescence in situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and morphologic analysis.

Authors:  Timothy D Jones; Shaobo Zhang; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; John N Eble; Ming-Tse Sung; Gregory T MacLennan; Rodolfo Montironi; Puay-Hoon Tan; Suqin Zheng; Lee Ann Baldridge; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Low frequency of molecular changes and tumor recurrence in inverted papillomas of the urinary tract.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Johanna M M van Oers; Ellen C Zwarthoff; Theo H van der Kwast; Oehler Ulrich; Burkhard Helpap; Stephan Stoerkel; Hagen Blaszyk; John Cheville; Guido Sauter; Peter J Wild; Robert Stoehr; Ferdinand Hofstaedter; Arndt Hartmann
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Can Inform the Differential Diagnosis of Low-Grade Noninvasive Urothelial Carcinoma with an Inverted Growth Pattern and Inverted Urothelial Papilloma.

Authors:  Juan-Juan Sun; Yong Wu; Yong-Ming Lu; Hui-Zhi Zhang; Tao Wang; Xiao-Qun Yang; Meng-Hong Sun; Chao-Fu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Inverted urothelial papilloma: A rare pathology in young girl. A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Alhareth Baarimah; Ahmed El Helaly; Mustafa Al Ghanbar; Abdulhakim Alotay; Fouad Khodier
Journal:  Urol Case Rep       Date:  2020-12-19

2.  Proteomic-Based Machine Learning Analysis Reveals PYGB as a Novel Immunohistochemical Biomarker to Distinguish Inverted Urothelial Papilloma From Low-Grade Papillary Urothelial Carcinoma With Inverted Growth.

Authors:  Minsun Jung; Cheol Lee; Dohyun Han; Kwangsoo Kim; Sunah Yang; Ilias P Nikas; Kyung Chul Moon; Hyeyoon Kim; Min Ji Song; Bohyun Kim; Hyebin Lee; Han Suk Ryu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.