Literature DB >> 15618600

Cortical and trabecular bone at the forearm show different adaptation patterns in response to tennis playing.

Gaële Ducher1, Stéphanie Prouteau, Daniel Courteix, Claude-Laurent Benhamou.   

Abstract

Bone responds to impact-loading activity by increasing its size and/or density. The aim of this study was to compare the magnitude and modality of the bone response between cortical and trabecular bone in the forearms of tennis players. Bone area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) of the ulna and radius were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 57 players (24.5 +/- 5.7 yr old), at three sites: the ultradistal region (50% trabecular bone), the mid-distal regions, and third-distal (mainly cortical bone). At the ultradistal radius, the side-to-side difference in BMD was larger than in bone area (8.4 +/- 5.2% and 4.9 +/- 4.0%, respectively, p < 0.01). In the cortical sites, the asymmetry was lower (p < 0.01) in BMD than in bone area (mid-distal radius: 4.0 +/- 4.3% vs 11.7 +/- 6.8%; third-distal radius: 5.0 +/- 4.8% vs 8.4 +/- 6.2%). The asymmetry in bone area explained 33% of the variance of the asymmetry in BMC at the ultradistal radius, 66% at the mid-distal radius, and 53% at the third-distal radius. The ulna displayed similar results. Cortical and trabecular bone seem to respond differently to mechanical loading. The first one mainly increases its size, whereas the second one preferentially increases its density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15618600     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:7:4:399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  17 in total

1.  Influence of age and morphological characteristics on whole body, lumbar spine, femoral neck and 1/3 radius bone mineral apparent density in a group of Lebanese adolescent boys.

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Elie Moussa; Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-12-25       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Health benefits of tennis.

Authors:  Babette M Pluim; J Bart Staal; Bonita L Marks; Stuart Miller; Dave Miley
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Bone geometry, density, and strength indices of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastic activity.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Portia P E Flowers; Joseph A Spadaro; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  Total body, lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in overweight adolescent girls: decreased or increased?

Authors:  Rawad El Hage; Christophe Jacob; Elie Moussa; Claude-Laurent Benhamou; Christelle Jaffré
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Simplified boundary conditions alter cortical-trabecular load sharing at the distal radius; A multiscale finite element analysis.

Authors:  Joshua E Johnson; Karen L Troy
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Water polo is associated with an apparent redistribution of bone mass and density from the lower to the upper limbs.

Authors:  Stavros A Kavouras; Faidon Magkos; Mary Yannakoulia; Maria Perraki; Melina Karipidou; Labros S Sidossis
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Regulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling within and from osteocytes.

Authors:  Travis A Burgers; Bart O Williams
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Exercise and bone mass in adults.

Authors:  Amelia Guadalupe-Grau; Teresa Fuentes; Borja Guerra; Jose A L Calbet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Bone mineral density in prepubertal obese and control children: relation to body weight, lean mass, and fat mass.

Authors:  Emilie Rocher; Christine Chappard; Christelle Jaffre; Claude-Laurent Benhamou; Daniel Courteix
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Bone mineral density in 11-13-year-old boys: relative importance of the weight status and body composition factors.

Authors:  Arturs Ivuskans; Evelin Lätt; Jarek Mäestu; Meeli Saar; Priit Purge; Katre Maasalu; Toivo Jürimäe; Jaak Jürimäe
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.