Literature DB >> 16770467

Water polo is associated with an apparent redistribution of bone mass and density from the lower to the upper limbs.

Stavros A Kavouras1, Faidon Magkos, Mary Yannakoulia, Maria Perraki, Melina Karipidou, Labros S Sidossis.   

Abstract

The bone response to exercise is site-specific and load-dependent. Recent evidence suggests that an inverse relationship may exist between loaded and unloaded sites, such that the former may benefit at the expense of the latter. The present study examined this possibility in 48 males (21 water polo players, 12 handball players, and 15 sedentary controls). Water polo and handball are alike with respect to the active loading of the upper limbs during overhead throwing; however, the weight-supporting environment of water polo removes the weight-bearing effect from the lower limbs. Bone mineral content (BMC), bone projected area (Ap), and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the total body and of various subregions were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. After adjusting for age, height, and weight, water polo players had higher arms BMC, Ap, and aBMD (by 22.2, 11.1, and 10.5%, respectively; P<0.05), but lower legs aBMD (-6.3%; P<0.05) relative to controls. On the contrary, compared to controls, handball players had higher BMC (from 11.8 to 24.3%), Ap (from 5.2 to 11.7%), and aBMD (from 6.4 to 11.9%) for the total body at all sites. Water polo athletes had increased arms and decreased legs aBMD ratios (regional-to-total) than either handball players or sedentary subjects (P<0.001). Water polo is associated with an apparent redistribution of bone mass and density from the lower to the upper limbs, with no major effects on the rest of the body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16770467     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-006-0201-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  24 in total

1.  Effects of different sports on bone density and muscle mass in highly trained athletes.

Authors:  A Andreoli; M Monteleone; M Van Loan; L Promenzio; U Tarantino; A De Lorenzo
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Modeling elite male athletes' peripheral bone mass, assessed using regional dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A M Nevill; R L Holder; A D Stewart
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Bone density in eumenorrheic female college athletes.

Authors:  W L Risser; E J Lee; A LeBlanc; H B Poindexter; J M Risser; V Schneider
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data.

Authors:  D R Carter; M L Bouxsein; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Growth, physical activity, and bone mineral acquisition.

Authors:  D A Bailey; R A Faulkner; H A McKay
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.230

Review 6.  Exercise and bone mineral density.

Authors:  P D Chilibeck; D G Sale; C E Webber
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Variations in bone status of contralateral and regional sites in young athletic women.

Authors:  E J Lee; K A Long; W L Risser; H B Poindexter; W E Gibbons; J Goldzieher
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 8.  Overview of exercise and bone mass.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; R Marcus
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.670

Review 9.  The effects of progressive resistance training on bone density: a review.

Authors:  J E Layne; M E Nelson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Does lower-body BMD develop at the expense of upper-body BMD in female runners?

Authors:  Alan M Nevill; Melonie Burrows; Roger L Holder; Steve Bird; David Simpson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effects of Modifying the Distance of the Penalty Shot in Water Polo.

Authors:  Francisco Manuel Argudo; Roberto Ruiz-Barquín; Pablo José Borges
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.193

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.