Literature DB >> 15616139

Comparative genomics of centrality and essentiality in three eukaryotic protein-interaction networks.

Matthew W Hahn, Andrew D Kern.   

Abstract

Most proteins do not evolve in isolation, but as components of complex genetic networks. Therefore, a protein's position in a network may indicate how central it is to cellular function and, hence, how constrained it is evolutionarily. To look for an effect of position on evolutionary rate, we examined the protein-protein interaction networks in three eukaryotes: yeast, worm, and fly. We find that the three networks have remarkably similar structure, such that the number of interactors per protein and the centrality of proteins in the networks have similar distributions. Proteins that have a more central position in all three networks, regardless of the number of direct interactors, evolve more slowly and are more likely to be essential for survival. Our results are thus consistent with a classic proposal of Fisher's that pleiotropy constrains evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15616139     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  228 in total

1.  Level of gene expression is a major determinant of protein evolution in the viral order Mononegavirales.

Authors:  Israel Pagán; Edward C Holmes; Etienne Simon-Loriere
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  Eukaryotic genes of archaebacterial origin are more important than the more numerous eubacterial genes, irrespective of function.

Authors:  James A Cotton; James O McInerney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Molecular evolution, mutation size and gene pleiotropy: a geometric reexamination.

Authors:  Pablo Razeto-Barry; Javier Díaz; Darko Cotoras; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A genome-wide map of human genetic interactions inferred from radiation hybrid genotypes.

Authors:  Andy Lin; Richard T Wang; Sangtae Ahn; Christopher C Park; Desmond J Smith
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Genomic Signatures of Selective Pressures and Introgression from Archaic Hominins at Human Innate Immunity Genes.

Authors:  Matthieu Deschamps; Guillaume Laval; Maud Fagny; Yuval Itan; Laurent Abel; Jean-Laurent Casanova; Etienne Patin; Lluis Quintana-Murci
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  An entropic characterization of protein interaction networks and cellular robustness.

Authors:  Thomas Manke; Lloyd Demetrius; Martin Vingron
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Origins and impact of constraints in evolution of gene families.

Authors:  Boris E Shakhnovich; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Transcriptional reprogramming and backup between duplicate genes: is it a genomewide phenomenon?

Authors:  Xionglei He; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Population genetics of translational robustness.

Authors:  Claus O Wilke; D Allan Drummond
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-02-19       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Are sex-biased genes more dispensable?

Authors:  Judith E Mank; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.